Answer:
a. "unless it was quite necessary"
Hope this helps :)
Answer: Critical
Explanation:
In using the word 'oppressive', we can infer that the author is of the belief that Jews were being mistreated by those around them in the countries they stayed in.
This word therefore carries the connotation that the author is criticizing these conditions because in using the word 'oppressive', which carries a negative connotation, actions of others towards the Jews is seen in a negative light.
Answer/Explanation:
Logical fallacies are errors of reasoning—specific ways in which arguments fall apart due to faulty connection making. ... Knowledge of how successful arguments are structured, then—as well as of the different ways they may fall apart—is a useful tool for both academic reading and writing.
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
The rest are either untrue or opposite. Speech number two even has this : "We will know that the vast majority of the members of the human race are on our
side." The rest of that speech goes on about the not being alone theme.
Answer:
Congratulations to Bob Dylan, the surprise winner of the 2016 Nobel Prize for Literature. This is easily the most controversial award since they gave it to the guy who wrote Lord of the Flies, which was controversial only because it came next after the immensely popular 1982 prize for Gabriel García Márquez. Nobody can read the minds of the Nobel committee – it’s not that kind of award. You can’t argue that Dylan jumped the line in front of more deserving candidates because there’s no internal logic to the process. Like most literary Nobels, except much more so, it comes out of the blue, giving Dylan fans a whole new glorious enigma to battle over. So settle in. This argument will take us years. If you’re looking to get silly, you better go back t0 where you came from.
Explanation:
