All categories

3 years ago

Why were savings and loans (S&Ls) originally established?

Business

2 answers:

bagirrra123 [75]3 years ago

8 0

It's C "to help people buy homes" on edge nuity!

solmaris [256]3 years ago

3 0

Option (C) is correct. The savings and loans (S&Ls) were originally established to help people buy homes.

Further Explanation:

Saving and loan association:

Saving and loan association is a financial entity that deals with saving deposits and mortgage loans. These entities provide the same services as a commercial bank but majorly emphasis on residential mortgages. The main aim of the saving and loan association is to provide the home facility to all U.S. citizens. Their rules of lending the mortgage loan differ from the rules of other commercial banks.

Justification for the correct and incorrect options:

To help people invest in small businesses: This is an incorrect option because the main aim of saving and loan association is to provide the housing facility.

To help people save money: This is an incorrect option because this task can be carried out by the commercial bank.

To help people buy homes: This is the correct option because this association was established for providing the housing facility to the U.S. citizens.

To help people invest in the stock market: This is an incorrect option because it does not provide any financial consultancy to the customers.

Thus, option (C) is correct. The savings and loans (S&Ls) were originally established to help people buy homes.

Learn More:

1. Learn more about the identical products

brainly.com/question/5489805

2. Learn more about the filing of tax return

brainly.com/question/5793642

3. Learn more about the demand for the product

brainly.com/question/11093180

Answer Details:

Grade: Middle school

Chapter: the Banking system

Subject: Business studies

Keywords: savings, and loans (S&Ls), originally, established,

help, people, invest, small, businesses, save, money, buy, homes,

invest, stock market

You might be interested in

Thomas Kratzer is the purchasing manager for the headquarters of a large insurance company chain with a central inventory operat

klemol [59]

Answer:

A) EOQ = 208.56 units

B) Average inventory = 104.28 units

C) Optimum number of order = 28.76 times

Explanation:

Economic order quantity is the order quantity that minimizes the balance of ordering and carrying cost.

Economic order quantity = √2× 29× 6,000/8=208.56 units

Average inventory = Minimum stock level + Order quantity/2

minimum stock level is not given , hence

Average inventory = 208.56/2 = 104.28 units

Optimum number of order

Optimum number of order = Demand / order quantity

= 6000/208.56= 28.76 times.

EOQ = 208.56 units

B) Average inventory = 104.28 units

C) Optimum number of order = 28.76 times

3 0

4 years ago

How do patents encourage technological progress

Setler79 [48]

Patents are used to balance the right of the individual with the concept of the public good. In general, the purpose of a patent is two-fold: to allow the inventor of some new thing to retain exclusive rights as to its use for a limited period of time, and after that time to ensure that the details of the invention are available for public use.
By granting the patent-holder exclusive rights to their invention, use and duplication of the invention is at the sole discretion of the inventor, potentially allowing them to profit from it. However, after a period of time those exclusive rights cease to apply, and the new invention becomes available to the public. This contributes to the public good by increasing the amount of general knowledge available.

7 0

3 years ago

Haver Company currently produces component RX5 for its sole product. The current cost per unit to manufacture the required 69,00

Gnesinka [82]

Answer:

It is cheaper to make the units in-house. The company will save $207,000.

Explanation:

Giving the following formula:

Production:

Direct materials $ 5.00

Direct labor 9.00

Varaible overhead= 10 - 8= $2

Total fixed overhead= (10*0.8)*69,000= $621,000

Direct materials and direct labor are 100% variable.

Overhead is 80% fixed.

An outside supplier has offered to supply the 69,000 units of RX5 for $19.00 per unit.

I will assume that none of the fixed overhead is avoidable.

First, we need to calculate the incremental cost of making 69,000 units. As it is incremental, we will take into account only the variable costs:

Make in-house:

Total variable cost= 69,000*(5 + 9 + 2)= $1,104,000

Now, the total cost of buying:

Buy:

Total cost= 69,000*19= $1,311,000

It is cheaper to make the units in-house. The company will save $207,000.

6 0

3 years ago

mixas84 [53]

Answer:

I'm pretty sure its (A)

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Braam Corporation uses direct labor-hours in its predetermined overhead rate. At the beginning of the year, the estimated direct

netineya [11]

Answer:

C. $148,350

Explanation:

Actual Overhead $143,350

Less: Underapplied Overhead $18,220

Total Overhead applied $125,130

Actual Direct labor hours = 9700 hours

Overhead rate = Total Overhead applied / Actual Direct labor hours

Overhead rate = $125,130 / 9700 hours

Overhead rate = $12.90 per hour

Estimated Direct Labor hours = 11,500 hours

Estimated Manufacturing Overhead at the beginning = Estimated Direct Labor hours * Overhead rate

Estimated Manufacturing Overhead at the beginning = 11,500 hours * $12.90 per hour

Estimated Manufacturing Overhead at the beginning = $148,350

5 0

3 years ago