Vikings
more specifically leif eriksson
In diversity of citizenship cases, if a case involves multiple plaintiffs with separate and distinct claims must satisfy the jurisdictional amount.
Diversity jurisdiction is a type of subject-matter jurisdiction recognized by U.S. law that enables federal courts to hear disputes without a federal question at issue.
There are two requirements that must be satisfied for a U.S. federal court to have diversity jurisdiction over a case.
The plaintiffs must be citizens of different U.S. states than the defendants, which is known as "diversity of citizenship," between the parties. Second, the "amount in controversy" in the case must exceed $75,000.
These two requirements must be met for a lawsuit to be considered in a federal court in the United States, unless it raises a federal issue in which case it must be heard in state court.
Learn more about diversity here:
brainly.com/question/14696671
#SPJ4
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no se anexan opciones o incisos para responder, podemos comentar lo siguiente.
Desafortunadamente, no especificas de qué país estás hablando.
Por lo que las ideas que te compartimos a continuación son desde una perspectiva general. aplicables a nuestros países.
Las ideas más importantes sobre la participación igualitaria en las designaciones y elecciones de las autoridades en la historia del país son aquellas que son el resultado del consenso para darle la oportunidad a todos los niveles sociales de un país, la oportunidad de participar en unas elecciones limpias para elegir a sus gobernantes.
Sin esta posibilidad de participación igualitaria -que no discrimine personas por su raza, etnia, color de piel o posición social- no podrá existir un ideal democrático y participativo que garantice una elección en la que todos los miembros de la sociedad participen para elegir libremente el destino de su país.
Si no hay participación activa de la gente, no habrá quien presione y exija a los gobernantes los resultados que prometieron durante su campaña.
Answer:
The key findings are:
1. There is higher mortality rates for employees of lower employment grade
2. In comparison to men in higher employment grades, there is higher mortality rate specifically due to coronary heart disease for employees in the lower employment grade
The aspects of social life that appear to be the most important in triggering the stress response is EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Explanation:
According to Michael Marmot/Whitehall studies which was carried out in two continous studies. The first research was carried out between the 1966 to 1977, and the second study between 1985 to 1983, seeks to find correlation between the prevalence of cardiovascular disease and mortality rates among British civil servants. Using the civil servants of both gender as subjects of the study, and as well picking between 20 - 64 years of age and 35 to 55 years of age for both Whitehall 1&2 research conducted respectively.
Hence, in those researches, the following key findings we're concluded:
1. There is higher mortality rates for employees of lower employment grade
2. In comparison to men in higher employment grades, there is higher mortality rate specifically due to coronary heart disease for employees in the lower employment grade
Also, it was concluded that, the aspects of social life which appear to be the most important in triggering the stress response is EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Answer:
Is this more than one answer?
Explanation:
