It seems like the details of what p and q <em>are </em>in this context aren't all that important; it's the logical structure of the statement "p⇒q" we need to look at. We read that logical statement as "p implies q," where p is our <em>hypothesis</em> and q is our <em>conclusion</em>. When we take the converse of a logical statement, we reverse the hypothesis and the conclusion. In this case, <em>p </em>wouldn't imply <em>q</em>, but <em>q </em>would imply <em>p</em> in the converse of p⇒q. We'd write this statement as:
q⇒p
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
I don’t know why they bother teaching recursive formulas as the explicit is almost always used :)
For 2,9,16,23...
Recursive is a(n+1)=an+7
Explicit is an=2+7(n-1)
(or more neatly an=7n-5)
For 2,14,98,686...
Recursive is a(n+1)=7an
Explicit is an=2(7^(n-1))
(or (2/7)7^n )
I think it is A. -7
I think that because FG's distance is 6, and if FG and HI are equal, then their distances should both be equal to 6.
Answer:
E) 16
Step-by-step explanation:
4 * 4 = 16
Hope this helps
