Step-by-step explanation:
The trick here is to realize that this is not a sum of the money that the three people paid originally, as that would need to include the money the clerk has ($25). This is instead a sum of a smaller amount the people could have paid ($9 × 3 people = $27), added with the additional money that the clerk would not have needed had they paid that smaller amount ($27 paid - $25 actual cost = $2). Another way to say this is, the $27 already includes the bellhop's tip. To add the $2 to the $27 would be to double-count it. So, the three guests' cost of the room, including the bellhop's tip, is $27. Each of the 3 guests has $1 in his pocket, totaling $3. When added to the $27 revised cost of the room (including tip to the bellhop), the total is $30.
To obtain a sum that totals to the original $30, every dollar must be accounted for, regardless of its location.
Thus, the sensible sum can be expressed in this manner:
Answer:
The two triangles are related by angles, so the triangles are similar but not proven to be congruent.
Step-by-step explanation:
Because the triangles have the same angles, they are congruent. The definition of congruence is if you take a shape and scale it up or down (or keep it the same) therefore, they are congruent.
Hope this helped, have a nice day
EDIT: I screwed up, I thought it was supposed to be similar. These triangles are SIMILAR not congruent. The actual answer is they are related by AAA similarity but they are similar, but they are not proven to be congruent. Hope this clears it up, and sorry.
~cloud
miles= 30 × hours
use this equation to fill out the graph and find out what y (miles traveled) equals.
for example, multiply 5 (the hours passed) by 30. Your answer would be 150, which is the miles the biker would travel in 5 hours.
Answer:
Sorry no idea
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm so sorry
A is your answer the this question
