Answer: in trial the prosecutor uses witnesses and evidence to prove to the jury that the facts of the case and to determine if the defendant committed the crime the attorney will have an opportunity to cross examine or ask questions to the same witness.
Explanation:
Answer:
False
Explanation:
If she proves that she committed a crime and went against the law that is enough. Nothing to much more than that matters.
This is based on who is telling the truth. The defendant denys being in the city at the time of the murder, but then a local newspaper states that he heard gunshots from inside his apartment the day of the murder (which would be impossible if he wasn't in the city at the same of the murder). There could also be a chance that the newspaper could be lying mainly because the defendant objected that the evidence was correct. In this case, the judge should take this into consideration especially when a local newpaper article announced that the defendant heard gunshots after saying that he was never in the city. So I would say, the newspaper article could be evidence to prove that the defendant is responsible for the murder.
What are your options hun:)
