1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maria [59]
2 years ago
5

Why do you think women, Aboriginals,

Law
1 answer:
lesantik [10]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Yes i do think women, Aboriginals,

inmates, and many immigrant groups were

historically disadvantaged in regard to their

right to vote.

You might be interested in
Is the power of a court to inquire into facts, apply the law, make decisions, and declare judgment in any matter.
Alex Ar [27]
C. Jurisdiction because they are the ones you keep everything in place while in court, they have and declare the judgment in the end and are to listen and apply the laws so nobody gets declared with a unfair law for which they’re the ones who have this power
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Type of law that was inapplicable to electronic transfers
AlexFokin [52]
The Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) is a federal law that protects consumers when they transfer funds electronically, including through the use of debit cards, automated teller machines (ATMs), and automatic withdrawals from a bank account.
8 0
2 years ago
Do you think any of the public order crimes should be legalized? which ones? and why?​
Vesna [10]

Answer:It depends on your worldview.

However,in my opinion victimless “crime” such a drug(marijuana) use should be fully legalized like in Netherlands. Because this way it is more safe and they pay taxes to the government

4 0
2 years ago
How many members of a jury are there for a criminal trial?
romanna [79]

Answer:

idk

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Which is true about criminal law?
nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

The statement that is true about criminal law is It involves wrongs against society.

Explanation:

Lets use process of elimination!

The first sentence states It provides the injured party with a remedy.

This would be personal injury case, not a criminal case.

The second sentence states It involves wrongs against individuals.

This would be a civil matter, not a criminal case.

The third sentence states It tries to return the injured party to the same position before injury.

This again would be a civil matter, not a criminal case.

Which leaves the fourth and final sentence. It states It involves wrongs against society.

This is the correct answer because if you did something to an individual, it would be a civil matter, but the wrongs against society would be like commiting a homicide, robery, grand theft, assult, arson, kidnapping, etc.

Hopefully this helps!!

Let me know if you still need help or if you have any questions!

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement listed below is the best example of mortgage fraud?
    8·1 answer
  • 2. What are the three parts of the executive branch?
    9·2 answers
  • Do you think there is a better way to reduce crime than punishment?
    15·2 answers
  • Descripe two ways in which the law protect citizens against xenophobia​
    7·1 answer
  • The Great Compromise proposed by the committee headed by Roger Sherman called for
    12·2 answers
  • You think to escape my question!!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • According to a constitutional court, what is the source of African values?<br><br><br><br><br>​
    5·2 answers
  • Is charli d'amelio getting abuse ple help due tonight
    13·2 answers
  • Don't use such phrases here, not cool! It hurts our feelings :(
    8·2 answers
  • A non-moving pickup or sedan with two people can weigh about:​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!