Answer:
i think the answer is d no. ,maybe?
The answer is juilet. hope this helped let me know if the answer is correct
The woodpecker gave Hiawatha the secret to defeating his enemy.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Throughout the passage, the author takes the stance that too much gaming is unhealthy and is a bad obsession for young people.
Let's analyze the answer choices.
A.
This choice is correct. The passage states that "young people become obsessed with video games". The author also says that "many gamers play indoors...They rarely do any outside activities, including exercise." If a sentence about the harmful effects of no exercise was added, it would help support the argument that too much gaming is harmful.
B.
This choice is incorrect. This sentence has nothing to do with the fact that excess gaming is bad.
C.
This choice is also incorrect. A release date for the PlayStation 3 doesn't help persuade the readers that too much gaming is not good.
D.
This choice is also incorrect. Games without consoles do not support the argument that gaming in excess is bad.
The best choice is A: A lack of physical activity can lead to obesity and diabetes.
Answer:
Tinker v. Des Moines was a ruling of the Supreme Court of 1969, through which an interpretation of the right to freedom of expression enshrined in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution was made.
In the events that motivated the cause, anti-war and pacifist students from different high schools in the city of Des Moines, Iowa, began to carry black ribbons on their arms as a protest and a sign of mourning for the lives of the young Americans and Vietnamese soldiers who were dying in battle.
School district authorities punished these students with suspensions and other disciplinary sanctions, against which their families sued the district. The Court, finally, established that the fact that these children wore black bracelets was part of their right to freedom of expression, and that the Des Moines school district could not limit this right, especially when the fact that they wore said bracelets did not impede the normal development of school activities or violate the rights of other children or third parties.
