Answer:
a. No, because Shelby made a mistake about the dog's value, not a mistake about a material fact.
Explanation:
Peggy made an offer to sell the dog for $800, they didn't discuss the dog's ancestry and Shelby wrongly assumed the dog was from champion lines and agreed to buy the dog for $800.
Based on further investigations, she discovered the dog was worth just $200.
She cannot rescind the contract because she wrongly assumed the dog's value not an error about à material fact. Peggy sold the dog at her own rates and Shelby bought the dog while wrongly assuming the value, so she cannot cancel the contract based on that.
False....Get a A lol your welcome
Answer:
4) Problem analysis
Explanation:
Problem analysis refers to a method of investigating consumer needs under certain complex conditions. It is carried out in order to improve systems, processes and designs.
In this scenario, Sony was offering an extremely disruptive product which wasn't very user friendly but as we all know had a huge potential. Sony's original digital camera was very large, huge compared to normal cameras that used film. It was also very slow and it wasn't very good at taking pictures. Is main advantage was that it used 3¹/₂ floppy disk instead of film.
I'm not sure but I believe it could store around 10-12 pictures and then you had to use another disk. Finally people could start to take a lot of pictures without having to worry about high printing costs. My family had the final commercial product, and if that was the good product, I imagine that those that participated in the product analysis probably had to use and work with something slightly worse.
Answer:
The answer would be D) The market clearing price is where quantity demanded is equal to quantity supplied.
Explanation:
The company that purchased the mine better approach the situation by developing a strategy that include all stakeholders.
In the year 2006, giant of the mining industry Xstrata purchased the Tintaya copper mine in Espinar, Peru. There has been a dispute between the community and the mine over issues including land rights, pollution, and social responsibility of the mining company. The previous mine owner had established a good dialogue table with the local community. According to many people , when Xstrata took over, the company did not abide by those arrangements which were made by the previous owner.
That is why if Xstrata wants to make better then it should consider the interest of every stakeholder over there.
To know more about Tintaya copper mine here:
brainly.com/question/11045973
#SPJ4