1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
astraxan [27]
3 years ago
5

Anti-federalists were against the ratification of the US constitution in part because they lacked which of the following?

History
2 answers:
Rzqust [24]3 years ago
8 0
It lacked protections of American citizens' basic rights. That's why the Bill of Rights was eventually added to the Constitution, because anti-federalists demanded it and federalists wanted to gain more support. So basically, it just lacked the Bill of Rights :)
Evgen [1.6K]3 years ago
6 0
They<span> feared a strong national government and a lack of protection for individual rights. Bill of Rights.</span>
You might be interested in
Why did president johnson commit more troops to fight on the ground in vietnam?
Aliun [14]

<span>President Johnson committed more troops to fight on the ground in Vietnam</span><span> because he faced an overwhelming political pressure for a hard-line approach on communism. Moreover, President Johnson was acting in response to the US commitment to succeed in Vietnam. He also envisaged countering the Domino effect through containment.</span>

4 0
3 years ago
Give two details for the main idea C. The fourteenth Amendment gave certain civil rights to Americans.
Jet001 [13]

The fourteenth Amendment provides equal protection for Americans. This means that no matter your age, race, gender, religion, etc, you will be treated equally by the government. Another one is immunity. This basically means that the states cannot take away certain rights we get from the Constitution. There are numerous rights the fourteenth Amendment give us and those are just two.

8 0
3 years ago
In the 1800s, european nations looked to control other countries in part to expand trade networks and establish global military
Amiraneli [1.4K]
This policy is known as COLONIZATION.
Colonization refers to the action of settling down among foreign indigenous people and establishing control over them. Politically, this action is usually carried out by powerful countries. The Europeans were able to colonize Africa, America and India.
7 0
3 years ago
What was the political significance of the great compromise and the three-fifths compromise?
Misha Larkins [42]

Answer:

The two compromises established a delicate balance between the North and the South.

Explanation:

The Great Compromise of 1787, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a political agreement during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that defined the structure of the legislature of the United States. Under the Compromise, the legislature would be divided in two chambers: the Senate, as the upper house, where every state would have equal representation, and the Congress, the lower house, where seats would be allocated to states proportionally, according to their population. The Three-Fifths Compromise, on the other hand, was the other great compromise agreed during the Constitutional Convention. According to this compromise, three out of every five slaves would be counted as part of the population of each slave state when allocating seats for the Congress.

<u>The political significance of these two compromises was that they established a delicate balance between the North and the South.</u> For the northern states, which were generally smaller than the southern ones, the Great Compromise meant that they would be considered as equals. For the southern states, the Three-Fifths Compromise meant that they were overrepresented. If slaves had not been counted, they'd have been a minority in Congress. However, this balance was very fragile, and the disagreements between the North and South erupted into the Civil War of 1861-65,

8 0
3 years ago
How is multiculturalism celebrated in New Zealand?​
IRINA_888 [86]

Answer:

New Zealand is a multicultural country.  New Zealand's citizens accept and welcome multiculturalism. The majority of residents of New Zealand accept other ethnicities and nationalities and have no problem with all of them as long as they obey the law and respect the regulations of the country.

Explanation

A multicultural New Zealand where people of different cultures and beliefs live safely and in harmony.

To represent and support multicultural councils and ethnic, migrant and refugee communities through leadership, partnership, capacity building and service delivery.

Diversity, Inclusiveness, Equality, Participation, Collaboration, Service to the Community.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Does the U.S. Supreme Court have the power to determine whether a law goes against the Constitution?
    12·1 answer
  • Please help due soon:-( What invention made it more profitable to grow cotton? A. Steel plow B. Cotton gin C. Spinning wheel D.
    15·2 answers
  • ONE Impact gutenbergs printing press bad On Western Europe was
    13·2 answers
  • What were indians arrived they'd lose if they joined south in civil war
    7·1 answer
  • What other The KKK went after African Americans during Reconstruction groups were added to the KKK's hate list?ANSWER THIS ASAP
    8·1 answer
  • Which state was added to help maintain the balance between the slave states and free states in 1820?
    5·2 answers
  • How long has roseanne barr been a politician
    15·2 answers
  • The first wave of immigrants to the United States was largely from northern and central Europe.
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE ANSWER ASAP!!!
    13·1 answer
  • PLEADE HELP WILL Give brainliest Write three body paragraphs for an essay arguing that either the UNIA or the
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!