Bro, you posted this question 4 times, CHILL XD
Answer:
d. not use a design tool that appears too good to be true
Explanation:
Silver Bullet Syndrome defined as the belief that the next drastic change in tools, resources or procedures will put an end to all the problems that exist within a company. According to my research on the silver bullet syndrome, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the analyst should not use a design tool that appears too good to be true. Since designs like this that provide miraculous solutions are always false or wrong.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
<span>The cookies served as conditioned stimulus.</span>
As a bystander, using the Direct approach might not work if the person becomes defensive.
There are several approaches to dealing with conflict as a bystander such as:
- being direct and telling the person who is in the wrong that they are in the wrong
- distracting the parties involved by suggesting an alternative activity
- delegating the issue to someone who the parties in conflict trust such as a friend or authority figure
When being direct, it is best that it is only done when you know the person enough that they will not take offence at your action because they could get defensive or hostile if not.
In conclusion, use the other approaches described when a person is being hostile as opposed to being direct.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/12159116.</em>
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Saving junk suggests that Armand is paranoid.
