Answer:Lack of Feasibility studies
Explanation:
He might experience obstacle if he choose not to understand the area and its demand by the people around the selected area.
Secondly is lack of capital to start up the business.
Answer:
A change in quantity demanded is caused by a change in price only. That is, when price rises quantity demanded falls vise versa
A change in demand occurs when there is a shift in the demand caused by a change in other determinates of demand other than price such as change in income, change in taste and fashion, demographic changes etc.
Explanation:
Real word example of change in demand :
Changing Tastes or Preferences
From 1990 to 2020, the per-person consumption of chicken by Americans rose from 48 pounds per year to 85 pounds per year, and consumption of beef fell from 77 pounds per year to 54 pounds per year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Changes like these are largely due to movements in taste, which change the quantity of a good demanded at every price: that is, they shift the demand curve for that good, rightward for chicken and leftward for beef.
Simply put it this way> Change in quantity demanded : Price change, quantity demanded change
Change in Demand: Price doesn't change but quantity demanded changes as a result of change in other determinates of demand examples the change in preference
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
Answer and Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below"
On Aug 26
Cash Dr $768,000
To Common stock $640,000
To Additional paid in capital $128,000
(Being issuance of the common stock is recorded)
On Oct 1
Cash Dr $410,000
To preferred stock $410,000
(Being the issuance of the preferred stock is recorded)
On Nov 30
Cash Dr $187,000
To Common stock $170,000
To Additional paid in capital $17,000
(Being issuance of the common stock is recorded)
Answer:
issue guidelines for employer conduct in administering equal employment opportunity programs.
Explanation:
This act known as the The Equal Employment Opportunity Act was enacted to check discrimination and unfair treatment against minorities such as African Americans. This act has given the right to sue whenever any form of discrimination based on race, skin color, religious affiliation is found in the work place.
Therefore the correct answer is issue guidelines for employer conduct in administering equal employment opportunity programs.