Answer:
1. Proactive
2. Retroactive
Explanation:
Proactive interference can be described as a situation whereby past memories make it difficult for an individual to retain new memories. It occurs when a material or an item learnt in the past causes an interference effect such that newer materials or items are difficult to acquire or retrieve.
On the other hand, retroactive interference occurs when a more recent information makes it difficult for an individual to recall or remember older information. This implies that new memories are preventing a person from retaining older or more previous information.
From the question therefore, when you enter an old password to retrieve your email, rather than entering your new password, you are demonstrating proactive interference. On the other hand, not being able to recall your old phone number is an example of retroactive interference.
Answer:
One problem regarding inconsistency in moral reasoning is that it affects the harmony between our actions and inner values.
Explanation:
Moral Reasoning refers to the way in which a person identifies what is right and wrong. He uses <u>logic</u> in order to deal with this. This guides the principles that a person follows in life. This can be affected by several factors such as: <em>intelligence, age, emotion, how the child was brought up, to name a few.</em>
<u>Consistency in moral reasoning means that a person's actions and inner values should be "consistent" or in harmony with each other.</u> For example, if a person knows that throwing garbage along the river is bad, then he doesn't do that. He also acts as an advocate by telling people not to do it as well.
Once inconsistency occurs in moral reasoning, it causes a disharmony between the actions and inner values. It makes the person confused on what to do in his life. It becomes harder for him to follow the right path.
Dakota hates making decisions, especially about things she does not like. her mom wants her to either mow the lawn or clean her room this weekend. this is an example of avoidance-avoidance conflict.
In their daily lives, people face several decisions. However, there are situations when those choices must be made between two equally unpleasant possibilities. The term "avoidance-avoidance conflict" in psychology refers to situations in which a person postpones making a choice because they do not like either of their options. A strategy for managing emotions of worry about the potential consequences of either choice is to avoid making tough decisions.
Learn more about avoidance-avoidance conflict
brainly.com/question/20345064
#SPJ4