There are many influences that could potentially lead a member of the House of Representatives to vote against the wishes of the people in their district. Simply the member could think that their constituents are incorrect in their view or don't possess enough information so therefore, they decide not to vote in accordance with the views of their constituents. Another influence could be that of their political party or the elites in their party that wish for the member to vote a certain a way. Another influence could be special interest groups or lobbies that seek to sway the views of Congress Members. These are all factors that together or separately could make a member of Congress vote in opposition of their constituents views.
A. Suspension
It's the only term that fits the situation
When a scientist is performing genetic tests in order to identify a specific individual they use specific markers that are found in the short-tandem repeat section of the DNA sequence. These regions are the most variable among the individuals that belong to the same species, therefore they are the best choice for trying to identify a specific individual.
The more markers they use, they can be more certain that this is a specific individual, in our case an elephant.
Roosevelt relied on the US having a strong navy
Answer:
Exculpatory evidence
Explanation:
Exculpatory evidence is "any evidence in a criminal trial that supports the idea that the defendant is not guilty".
So for this case is the best option since we want the information or evidence that could assist(or help) the accused.
This is an evidence favorable to the defendant in any trial and can exonerates or help in order to exonerate the defendant.
Other important thing is that is the opposite of inculpatory evidence, which try to present guilt the accused.
