The camp David accords was used to set peace between the countries of Israel and Egypt in the year of 1979.
<u>Explanation:</u>
To end the war between the countries of Israel and Egypt and to bring peace between them, the Camp David accords was signed in 1979. This peace treaty was signed after negotiating for twelve days between both these countries. The treaty was signed by the Prime Minister of Israel Menachim Begin and the president of Egypt Anwar Sadat.
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was adopted in the Constitution of Canada in 1982. This Charter guarantees the rights and freedoms of every citizens in Canada. It ensures various political rights to Canadian people and civil rights to everyone who resides in Canada.
The Charter is similar to the American Bill of Rights and also forms first part of the Constitution Act of 1982. The Charter tends to protect fundamental rights of evey citizen such as voting, fair judgements, freedom of religion, thought, freedom of the press, right to peaceful assembly, freedom of association, etc.
The Charter also protects the rights of the First Nations people. First Nations is the term used in Canada to specify those people or tribes who had first hand encounter with Europeans, also known as Aboriginal people.
Therefore, option B is correct.
Powers that are given to both the State and federal government are called concurrent powers. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the last option or option "D". There are some powers given to the federal government alone and the state government alone. I hope the answer helps you.
Answer: Chandragupta Maurya
Explanation: He was the strongest emperor because he was the first emperor to be able to unify India into one state. He founded the Maurya dynasty and was the first emperor of India.
Hope this helps!: )
The Modern Industry
The modern automotive industry is huge. In the United States it is the largest single manufacturing enterprise in terms of total value of products, value added by manufacture, and number of wage earners employed. One of every six American businesses is dependent on the manufacture, distribution, servicing, or use of motor vehicles; sales and receipts of automotive firms represent more than one-fifth of the country’s wholesale business and more than one-fourth of its retail trade. For other countries these proportions are somewhat smaller, but Japan, South Korea, and the countries of western Europe have been rapidly approaching the level in the United States.
Consolidation
The trend toward consolidation in the industry has already been traced. In each of the major producing countries the output of motor vehicles is in the hands of a few very large firms, and small independent producers have virtually disappeared. The fundamental cause of this trend is mass production, which requires a heavy investment in equipment and tooling and is therefore feasible only for a large organization. Once the technique is instituted, the resulting economies of scale give the large firm a commanding advantage, provided of course that the market can absorb the number of vehicles that must be built to justify the investment. Although the precise numbers required are difficult to determine, the best calculations, considering both the assembly operation and the stamping of body panels, place the optimum output at between 200,000 and 400,000 cars per year for a single plant. Increasingly stringent and costly regulations aimed at correcting environmental damage due to the rising number of vehicles on the road also have been a factor in the move toward consolidation.
The structural organization of these giant enterprises, despite individual variation, resembles the pattern first adopted by General Motors in the 1920s. There is a central organization with an executive committee responsible for overall policy and planning. The operating divisions are semiautonomous, each reporting directly to the central authority but responsible for its own internal management. In some situations the operating divisions even compete with each other. The Ford Motor Company was consciously reorganized on the GM pattern after World War II; other American automotive firms have similar structures.