Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
j1= -9 j2= 9
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: The (magnitude of the) rate of change increases over time. The object drops 16 feet in the first second, but 80 feet in the last second.
Explanation:
1) I will start by showing the table in an easy way to read and understand:
Time (seconds) Height (feet)
0 144
1 128
2 80
3 0
2) Rate of change
- An initial clarification: the rate of change decreases since it is becoming more negative every second, but, in the analysis, the reasonable is to deal with the magnitude of this rate. The results shown below that the rate as a negative value, but the comparison is set about the magnitude of the change.
- The rate of change is calculated for every pair of consecutive points using this equation:
rate of change = [change in height] / [time elapsed]
a) rate₁: [128 - 144] feet / [ 1 - 0] sec = - 16 feet / sec ⇒ the object drops 16 feet in the first second.
b) rate₂ = [80 - 128] feet / [2 - 1] sec = - 48 feet/sec ⇒ the object drops 48 feet in the next second
c) rate₃ = [0 - 80] feet / [3 - 2] sec = - 80 feet/sec ⇒ the object drops 80 feet in the last second.
The rate of change is more negative every second: it increases in magnitude over time. The object drops 16 feet in the first second, but 80 feet in the last second.
Answer:
what are the statements we pick from?
Step-by-step explanation:
most likely look out for angles and lengths that go against the established ratio
Answer:
B. False. Within stratified samples, the number of individuals sampled from each stratum should be proportional to the size of the strata in the population.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a stratified sample, each stratum should be proportional to that category of the population. This means that each stratum would potentially have a different number of elements in it.
