B. rust belt is the right answer
Answer:
The conflicts in the 17th century caused the English attitudes towards the Native to become hostile.
Explanation:
The arrival of the Europeans meant a change for the Native Americans. Together with diseases, the English settlers also brought different culture and religion and superior technology. The English considered their culture better, and attitudes often offensive and narrow. The growing number of English settlers, together with their endless greed for land, unavoidably led to conflicts.
In 1630, almost a thousand settlers arrived in the New World from England. Around twenty thousand people came between 1630-1640, settling in the Massachusetts Bay area, establishing villages and cities.
A massive increase in the white population had an impact on the lives of Native Americans. They were pushed out of their land where they have resided for years after arriving from Alaska. The land confiscated under Vacuum domicilium which allowed settlers to seize the uncultivated land with force and wars.
Louis Napoleon Bonaparte's seizure of power was the product of just another coup de etat. One of his guiding principles is found in his deep belief in the power of the middle class and its nationalist connotations with some similarities to the social policies of Bismarck.
Louis was mainly supported by the low classes, the peasants, He used his mandate to abolish the recently created representative assembly, in order to marginalize the liberal factions, finally becoming himself a new emperor in the second middle of the IX th century. Shortly after being in power he restored universal suffrage.
On the other hand: Bismarck’s realpolitik policies were employed in response to the failed revolutions of 1848 as a way of strengthening the state system and tighten social order. As the most famous advocate of Realpolitik, Otto became the first Chancellor, serving in the Kingdom of Prussia. The use of Realpolitik had him achieve Prussian dominance in Germany. Manipulating political issues causing antagonism in other countries and causing or engaging in wars if necessary, "the end justified the means".
Answer:
Its the second one so its B
Explanation:
Question: <em>What was the viewpoint for the Christians during the Crusades?</em>
Answer: The Crusade battles were religious wars between the Muslims and the Christians, all fighting to gain control of certain and specific 'holy sites' that were desired by both. Both sides were determined to take back what they deemed theirs and believed that the other side was in the wrong. The Christians, as normally peaceful people, believed that the horrors of war shouldn't have to continue, but did because they wanted what was theirs.
Uplifting Note: Conflict is a thing of the past! Our political and religious views should not have to define us, so just be friends.
