Answer:
The answer is: B) The reduction in economic surplus resulting from a market not being in competitive equilibrium.
Explanation:
Deadweight loss is an economic cost to society as a whole when market inefficiencies occur preventing it from reaching its equilibrium point. Market inefficiencies are caused by incorrect allocation of resources.
For example if a price ceiling is established, suppliers will tend to lower the quantity supplied while the quantity demanded either increases or stays the same. That economic deficiency resulting from an unsatisfied demand is what we call deadweight loss.
Other causes for deadweight loss are price floors (reduction of the quantity demanded) and taxation (shifts on the demand or supply curves).
Answer:
A price increase of 1% will reduce quantity demanded by 4%
Explanation:
If the price elasticity is 4 then, this demand is highly responsive to changes in price.
So it will decrease by more than the price increase.
we must remember that the price-elasticity is determinate like:
↓QD / ΔP = price-elasticity
if the cofficient is 4 then a 1% increase in price:
↓QD / 0.01 = 4
↓QD = 0.04
Quantity demanded will decrease by 4%
Answer:
A zero coupon bond:
A. is sold at a large premium.
B. has a price equal to the future value of the face amount given a positive rate of return.
C. can only be issued by the U.S. Treasury.
D. has less interest rate risk than a comparable coupon bond.
E. has a market price that is computed using semiannual compounding of interest.
Answer is : B
Explanation:
In classification of bonds we have a unique type of bond known as Zero-coupon bonds also know as Pure discount bonds, unlike traditional bonds they don’t pay coupon instead they are sold on discount basis and on maturity the bondholder receive a par value, for this reason the price will be at a discount on sale and on maturity be redeemed at par price showing a positive rate of return.
Answer:
Explanation:
Yes, Disparate Impact Theory can be used in this case relating to the processes of subjective selection such as interrogations. If a discriminatory workplace practice has an unfair and aggressive impact on minorities, it may be in violation of Title VII. Professional individual employees who support on the basis of discretionary judgments without intending to do so are engaging in biased conduct.
The case of Watson V. Fort Worth Bank & Trust will be used to support my claim. Clara Watson turned down a promotion that was contingent on an interview under this scenario.
The U.s. Supreme Court Declared that a Title VII claim to a strategy of subjection enforcement can only be investigated under the unequal care principle. In the majority decision, the Court allowed the principle of (disparate effects) to apply to arbitrarily defined work practices.
Answer:
B. No, because the efficiencies gained from exploiting comparative advantage generate more winners than losers.
Explanation:
Everything has its all pros and cons. When international trade takes place, people in the economy are happy, because of wide variety and options given.
Further the traders, manufacturers also tend to grow as due to competition they improve with the quality standards, designs, variations, etc:
Competition forces to excel in any kind of job you do. And that only the best players and performers stay in the market.
This is the advantage, of such international trades.
