Answer: Yes, I agree with Graeter’s decision to stop franchising?.
Explanation:
Graeter’s decision to stop franchising was simply to maintain the quality of their products.
If I was in his position, I'll also like to maintain our products quality. It is vital to keep the family business while also following the laid down principles by those before me. Hence, I agree with his decision.
Answer:
John is correct but Lynn isn't
Explanation:
John is correct because he left his coat with the coatroom attendant under the premise that it would be properly looked after and returned to him when he was done having lunch at the restaurant. However, Lynn just left her coat lying around under no ones care or supervision, there wasn't a predetermined agreement that anyone would be responsible for watching it on her behalf, therefore I don't think she is has the right to sue.
Answer:
$26,125
Explanation:
[($25,000 x 0.005) x 9 + $25,000]
=$26,125
Zach owe $26,125 as of December 31, 2019 because he did not fail to file - he failed to pay. Hence he owes the 0.5% per month or part of a month failure to pay penalty plus the already outstanding tax amount of $25,000 that he owed.
The category that does not belong to the periodic evaluation is Change Analysis.
Option D is the correct answer.
<h3>What is a periodic evaluation?</h3>
Periodic evaluation is a technique that is totally developmental in nature and disregards the formal advice relating to tenure, retention, or promotion of employees.
Periodic evaluation has three broad categories namely, hazard analysis, safety, and health-related inspections, and evaluation relating to personal protective equipment (PPE).
Therefore, out of the provided options, Change analysis is not considered a category for periodic evaluation.
Learn more about the periodic evaluation. in the related link;
brainly.com/question/17095233
#SPJ1
Answer:
It drives economic growth, enhanced efficiency, increased innovation, and the greater fairness that accompanies a rules-based system.