All categories

3 years ago

The combination of media, Internet, entertainment, and phone services into a single device illustrates the principal of

Business

1 answer:

gladu [14]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

digital convergence.

Explanation:

Digital convergence corresponds to a technology that guarantees the possibility of multimedia access to a single device such as a smartphone, which has text, photo, video, audio functions in one device, making access easier, simpler and faster.

It is possible, for example, to answer a work email while listening to music, all done through your cell phone.

You might be interested in

What are the dimensions of situational control identified by Fiedler's contingency leadership model? (Check all that apply.)

Kipish [7]

There are ways to control different situations. The dimensions of situational control Fiedler's contingency theory are leader-member relations, task structure, and position power.

Fiedler's is popularly known for his contingency theory. This theory helps to understand why managers can behave so differently.

The contingency theory states that there no one single leadership style often works for all employees.

He stated also that there are situational-contingent elements that influences a leader's ability to lead.

Learn more about Fiedler's contingency theory from

brainly.com/question/14615424

6 0

3 years ago

Find the average variable cost for producing 18 sneakers. Round your answer to the nearest hundredth.

murzikaleks [220]

Answer: $2.78

Explanation:

Average variable cost is calculated by dividing the total variable cost of producing a certain number of units of a good by that same number of units.

Average variable cost = Variable cost of producing 18 sneakers / 18

= 50 / 18

= 2.7778

= $2.78

7 0

3 years ago

Suppose Frank owns a vintage Porsche in mint condition. He agrees to sell it to Smith, but the night before the parties are to e

Korvikt [17]

Answer:

This is a situation arising from objective impossibility.

Explanation:

The contract was made for mint condition of car. The car damaged while it was with Frank. Thus, parties are thus discharged from their obligations under the contract.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Alice worked for Fountain Valley, Inc., a corporation that manufactured baby supplies. According to her employment contract with

earnstyle [38]

Question Completion with Answer Options:

A. Yes, according to the terms of her contract.

B. Yes, according to the duty of good faith and fair dealing.

C. No, according to the at-will termination provision in her contract.

D. No, because subsequent conduct of the parties modified the contract.

Answer:

Fountain Valley, Inc. and Alice

B. Yes, according to the duty of good faith and fair dealing.

Explanation:

Alice is entitled to the bonus of $10,000 because the duty of good faith and fair dealing requires Fountain Valley not to deny Alice the benefits arising from their valid contract. Since Alice's employment contract included a 5% bonus of all sales in excess of the previous 12 months' sales, the Fountain Valley, Inc. should not deny Alice's claim to the benefits.

b) Employment contract terms = $78,000/year plus 5% bonus of all sale in excess of the previous 12 months' sales. The value of sales in 2017 is $200,000 more than in 2016. 5% of $200,000 = $10,000. Therefore, Alice is entitled to the bonus.

8 0

3 years ago

On December 29, 2005, BJ Co. sold an equity security investment that had been purchased on January 4, 2004. BJ owned no other ma

sineoko [7]

Answer:

AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery

No No

The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.

The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.

The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.

For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago