How was England different than the absolute monarchies of both France and Russia during this time period?

History

1 answer:

devlian [24]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The correct answer is B) England became a constitutional monarchy, while France and Russia maintained an absolute monarchy.

Explanation:

England had gone through a liberal revolution and it was no longer an absolute monarchy. Unlike other countries in Europe, England was ruled by a Monarch with limited powers and there was always a check on what they can do.

A constitution clearly laid down the power of the Monarch and those powers could not be exceeded. The British parliament jealously ensured the limited powers of the Monarch.

However, countries such as France and Russia were completely in control of the Monarch with absolute power in the country.

You might be interested in

What social class increase as a result of urbanization

Mkey [24]

I believe that would be the working class.<span />

4 0

3 years ago

North Korea, China, and Cuba are modern examples of governments that legally or practically permit only one political party. In

Luda [366]

Answer:

These countries create a one-party system to limit what the people can do, while still making them think they have freedom. These systems often only have on candidate as well, keeping the same people in power, but making the people feel less oppressed. These countries want to show themselves as a Democracy, when they are really stuck in an Authoritarian government. This keeps more people in the country an helps boost morale, while the government can still do what it wants.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

What does this political cartoon suggest about the Évian Conference? It would successfully encourage more nations to take in Jew

spayn [35]

Answer:B

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is isolationism??

maria [59]