Answer:
The three fifths compromise "solved" the issue of when the slave states wanted to count their slaves as population so they could gain more seats in congress. But the dispute was between slave and non slave states.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions on who electors can vote for.
I agree with this decision because voting in the Electoral College is a serious thing, and members of the college have to assume this important and serious role. That is why they are members of the Electoral College and expressed their intention to vote for the candidate they supported.
I think there would be no room for faithless electors in the US Electoral College. There is no reason for them to vote for other people if they originally pledge to vote for their candidates.
On July 6, 2020, the case of Chiafalo v. Washington was decided.
<span>The Soviet Union bore the majority of the brunt in battling Hitler in the earlier years of World War II. They fought alone against over two hundred different German divisions. Both the US and England were working to build up their forces and could not help much beyond offering help in the future and to send supplies. It resulted in a rift that never fully healed.</span>
With the ability to forge iron tools, farming tools were more effective and provided a greater production and effectiveness. More food produced means that more people are able to be fed and consequently establish and work in the land. With a higher population and food cap, West Africa settlements were able to grow.
Answer:
They could now maintain a large army at the cost of the Indian states. This enabled them to fight wars far away from their own territories, since any war would occur in the territories either of the British ally or of the British enemy.
