Answer:
The answer is: the interactions we have with others and the roles we play in social groups.
Explanation:
Symbolic interactionism is a sociological theory that focuses on society on a micro-level, it is interested in dinamics and social phenomenons that take place in small groups. Symbolic interactionism's main focus is human interaction and how that interaction affects the way we behave and even the way we define ourselves. According to this theory, when we interact with others, in concrete social settings, we play different roles, these roles are learned through socialization in early childhood. Children learn what is expected from them when they interact with others.
Symbolic interactinism is also helpfull when studying the construction of the self, the way we see ourselves; according to this perspective the self is a result of how we think others see us, and it is also constructed in interaction with others.
Answer: PP i believe, my mother loves that type of flower and made me studied it so if i were to remember correctly its PP.
(new!! im sorry for i am wrong and Pp is correct i had just double checked it again im sorry for my first answer is wrong.)
Agriculture developed earlier near rivers in many parts of the world as this brought many advantages along with it. The soil was fertile, making farming more efficient and good crops would grow, the fish in the river could be a source of food and the river itself could be used for traveling purposes as this would be easier and cheaper. People also wouldn't have to travel very far to get water for their everyday uses. Thus, the river provided a stable and useful place where people could settle down and so agriculture developed in these areas.
<span>This cut is called the Eye-Line match cut. It is based on the premise that the viewer desires to see the object of interest of the character. Thus, the cut guides the viewers attention towards the "line" between the eye of the character and what he is ultimately looking at.</span>
Answer:
Nepal was not as useful to the British nor as threatening
Explanation:
For the East India Company, India especially Bengal was their cash cow. They had huge amount of agricultural lands and textile production in their control. When Bengal was threatened, through the ambitious Ahom kings and later the Burmese kings, those were defeated and annexed to.