I’m not good at maths thank me later
The 1st graph has vertex in (-3, -3) which can be translated into
Horizontal shift left 3
Vertical shift down 3
Other than that, the graph shows y=x^2 so it wasn't compressed or stretched
The 2nd graph has vertex in (0, 0) which mean there is no vertical and horizontal shift. But the graph is facing down and it was slimmer than y=x^2 graph. When x=1, the result is y=3 which was 3 times more than it supposed to be.
The graph must be:
Reflection across x-axis
Vertical stretch of 3
The 3rd graph has vertex in (3, -3) which can be translated into
Horizontal shift right 3
Vertical shift down 3
Same as the 1st graph, the 3rd graph shows y=x^2 so it wasn't compressed or stretched.
Answer: option 3
Step-by-step explanation:
so you would do
-2=3(1)-5
-2=3-5
-2=-2
Let c represent the original amount that this guy had saved up.
He spent 25% of this amount, or 0.25c, on the printer.
To progress further, we have to know how much the printer cost.
Supposing that the printer cost $100 (which we do not know as a fact), this would be equal to 0.25c.
Thus, his savings originally amounted to c = $100/0.25 = $400.
