Answer:
Gitlow v. New York (freedom of speech) it was a decision of the United States Supreme Court, stating that the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution was stipulated as a First Amendment Revision protecting freedom of expression and freedom of the press to apply in the US states.
Gideon v. Wainwright (right to a lawyer) this is a case of the United States Supreme Court. In it, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that states are required, under the Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution, to provide a lawyer to defendants in criminal cases that cannot afford their own lawyers.
Williamsburg was the second capital I believe
<span>i think the article would be very likely geared towards Winning the publics favor to prevent passing the bill.
They will probably form an interest group so the bill will not pass. If the bill passed, it will potentially reduce their potential income from that age group</span>
Answer:
From a statistical point of view, participants do not have enough information. To extrapolate statistical data, at least 30 subjects should be observed to make an inference, considering the traditional quantitative analysis and using the central limit theorem.
Explanation:
The central limit theorem, indicates that, in very general conditions, if Sn is the sum of n random independent variables and of not null but finite variance, then the function of distribution of Sn approximates to a normal distribution or Gauss distribution, therefore, the number of variables is quite enough in size to establish that the sample shares “normally” a characteristic such as “being obese” in the example referred regarding the tribe on the pacific island.
The answer is B: Expanded consumer choice will drive down prices
