New Spain was Central America, some islands surrounding, and went into Texas and California a bit.
New Netherlands was upper America including <span>New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Connecticut, and Delaware.
Many that came to New England came to escape religious persecution
Main crops there were </span>beans, squash, <span>pumpkins, corn, and tobacco. </span><span> New England Colonies included the </span>Connecticut Colony, Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Massachusetts Bay Colony, and the Province of New Hampshire <span>
Middle Colonies were settled because of the good soil and resources available.
They grew wheat, rye, oats, barley, and corn.
</span>Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, and Delaware were the middle colonies. <span>
Southern colonies were founded to make money. (Sorry I couldn't find much on this many sites are blocked at my school)
Rice, tobacco, and indigo were the main crops.
</span><span>Maryland, Virginia, North and South Carolina, and Georgia were the southern colonies</span><span>
The answer is functionalism because this is responsible of
having to promote stability and solidarity in a way of learning such as having
to understanding something in the purpose of having to know what behavior is
and how it will affect an individual.
B. The higher up a mountain you go, the colder it tends to get (and in my experience, the drier too, but I don't want to assume that's always the case), therefore the number of plants that can survive tends to decrease.
The evaluation of every matter requires a framework based on a useful ideas that are required for a better judgement for deriving a solution like if we want to resolve a mathematical problem, then we will use mathematical functions like +, -, *, etc so that we are able to solve the question because these are the ideas that are based on a useful ideas (Logic). Likewise when we want to assess whether the argument is good or not, we will require an ethical standard framework to evaluate the good in the argument.
So yes, I agree that ethics is an essential element of a good argument because it is the framework which decides which argument is good or not. These ethical values in a particular argument is a move from not good to good argument. Greater the ethical values in an argument the more is the argument good as per ethical principles.
