Answer:
warranty
Explanation:
A warranty is a guarantee from a seller to buyer promising to if necessary repair or replace the purchased item with a stated period.
Answer: More elastic; Lower
Explanation:
Before the entry of a new firm, there is only one firm exist in the market and that single firm is experiencing a monopoly power. But when there is a entry of its competitor then as a result second firm have to reduce their prices of the products as demand is elastic. We know that market is very sensitive to the prices. This fall in prices will lead to increase the demand for the products but with the lower prices, the marginal revenue of the second firm will be more elastic because of the lower prices.
Answer: collaborative filtering
Explanation:
Collaborative filtering is a technique thta helps to filter out the things that a user can like base on how other identical users react. Here, a small sample of the people with similar taste will be chosen from a larger group.
When you view a selection at Amazon and see "Customers who bought this (item) also bought ...," you are seeing the application of collaborative filtering.
Answer:
LaShawn's neighbor mows his lawn during the night.
DEPENDING ON HOW OFTEN LASHAWN'S NEIGHBOR MOWS HIS LAWN, A PRIVATE BARGAINING MIGHT BE USEFUL. IF THIS HAPPENS ONCE A MONTH, THE NEED OF INTERVENTION IS NOT SIGNIFICANT. BUT IF THIS HAPPENS MORE OFTEN, PROBABLY THEN BOTH MEIGHBORS WILL NEED TO BARGAIN AN OPTIMAL SOLUTION.
Opening an Apple store in a mall causes overall sales in the mall to increase by 10%.
THIS IS A POSTIIVE EXTERNALITY, THEREFORE, ANY TYPE OF INTERVENTION WILL PROBABLY MAKE THE SITUATION WORSE.
The production of steel results in pollution that affects millions of residents in the surrounding area.
IN THIS CASE, YOU NEED GOVERNMENT INTEREVENTION. POLUTION IS SOMETHING THAT AFFECTS THE GEENRAL PUBLIC, THEREFORE, IT MUST BE ADDRESSED BY THE EPA. IN CASE THE EPA AND OTHER GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS DECIDE TO DO NOTHING, THEN YES, PRIVATE BARGAINING WILL PROBABLY BE NECESSARY.
Answer:
Capitalized value $582.000.
Explanation:
Step 1. Given information.
- The common share of Miser had a fair value of $50 per share.
Step 2. Formulas needed to solve the exercise.
- Fair value of shares = Price per share * (Amount by selling scrap - exchanged shares)
- Capitalized value = fair value of shares - value of scrap.
Step 3. Calculation.
Fair value of shares = $50 * (18.000 - 6.000) = $600.000
<em />
<em>Land should be capitalized by fair market value of share exchanged less any recovery of scrap as land will be developed for future plant. </em>
Step 4. Solution.
<em />
Fair value of shares = $50*12.000 = $600.000
Less: value of scrap = $18.000 .
Capitalized value = $600.000 - $18.000 = $582.000.
