1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
QveST [7]
3 years ago
10

How were the conditions under which early civilizations developed in Asia and Africa different from those of the Americas?

History
1 answer:
mario62 [17]3 years ago
8 0

Early civilizations were ancient and did not have great technologies and the knowledge and help the early colonists of the Americas got from the Europeans.

 

Here are plenty of reasons that could justify referring to these civilizations as distinct from other peoples. What really distinguishes the Aztecs, the Mayans, the Apachee tribes and others, from the rest of the world, is that they were confined within an area that kept them from interacting with the Europeans, the Asians, and the Africans, and thus spreading their culture there. That led to the isolation of the people in the Americas, resulting to their civilizations being seemingly 'prehistoric'. What I mean by that is that they couldn't have access to materials that would in turn allow them to use more advanced technology. While they did have plenty of chocolate, there are other things that they definitely lacked, and as such we can see that their weapons were inadequate, and in comparison to those of the Europeans, they were petty. It's also noteworthy that there were no longer horses in the Americas, seeing as they had all died out. The first horse that arrived in the continent, after a long time, belonged to the Spanish armada. This is the most significant reason as to how the civilizations in America were different than those in the rest of the world. While I can name other reasons, such as distinctly different architecture, different cuisine, way of life, etc., these are not as noteworthy as the previous reasons that I named.

<span> </span>

You might be interested in
Why would states with smaller populations favor each state having one vote in Congress? What might be the position of states wit
Marina86 [1]

Answer:

Because it lets them have equal say with other states

Explanation:

States with smaller populations favor having a set number of representatives in Congress because it allows them to still have an influence on politics. If representation in a body of power depends on population size, then the states with a larger population will have more representatives, and therefore the interests of the larger states will be pushed more, while the smaller states' voices will be drowned out. Larger states would most likely prefer representation based on population because it gives them more say on politics and because it serves the interests of the majority of the overall population.

6 0
3 years ago
During what was known as the Middle Passage?
nignag [31]
The middle passage was the transporting of slaves from Africa to America. Many slaves perished on this journey due to the conditions.
5 0
2 years ago
Why did the Ku Klux Klan experience a revival during the 1920s throughout the nation?
Kazeer [188]

Answer:

dog cat hat mat on a flat SAT

3 0
2 years ago
People of one area can produce much of one product, and in fact, not use that product. In this case, economic specialization occ
matrenka [14]
According to the passage, unequal distribution of resources leads to "<span>B. specialization and trade" since those who lack certain goods trade the goods they do have, so everyone "wins". </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Why was slavery a contradictory issue<br> in Jeffersons life
artcher [175]

Answer:

Because Jefferson was actually against slavery. Even while he owned slaves, it sickened him. however Jefferson as in some of his writings, feared that unless given a direction Slaves would not be productive members of society as they would not, and that due to their lack of education would rebel against their previous owners even thouh they became free.

Jefrerson battles with the idea of freeing slaves and the idea of the consequences of freeing the slaves giving them nothing and having come from nothing. to him it would have been just as bad to free them with nothing to stand on as opposed to keeping them in their current state until something better could be arranged for them.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • True or false: Gerald Ford was president of the US when the Watergate break-in occurred.
    9·2 answers
  • True or false 4. sparta eventually replaced their kings with a military oligarchy in order to maintain a strong military.
    6·1 answer
  • The Morrill Act was passed in 1862 that granted each state ___ for colleges.
    12·1 answer
  • Which atmospheric layer protected the earth against the danger of the rock
    12·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the Declaratory Act (1766)?
    14·2 answers
  • Select ALL of the factors that motivated African Americans to relocate to Northern cities during the Great Migration.
    15·1 answer
  • What are three things that heavily populated cities in Asia o to support their population
    11·1 answer
  • Read the thes is statement from an argumentative essay about the importance of National Parks to the economy.
    13·2 answers
  • Which group started off with militia from the Boston area?
    8·2 answers
  • How did the Great Depression affect the whole world?.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!