This is just a basic answer, but after the attack on Pearl Harbor they were pretty upset. They began to attack Japan, and even to used nuclear weapons. They warned Japan about this but they didn't believe them. It was a hard fought war but the U.S won.
Explanation:
In simpler words, the multi-part question is asking for you to first analyze the three sources, then pick a side and have knowledge to defend your point on the question 'to what extent should nations pursue their national interests'.
In source 1, it shows that the majority of Canadians are opposed to sending troops to Afghanistan, with 36% voting for, 5% unsure, and 59% voting against.
Source two is clearly depicting the nazi's, at a rally held in Nuremberg. Although the source does not state if the protesters are pro or against Nazi regime, I am assuming they are pro. This would lead to the assumption that the people of Nuremberg are pro-Nazi empire.
The source 3 is a timeline, that goes from 1920 to 2005. This time period is very significant, because it captures many important battles, such as world war 2, Persian Gulf War, and the Iraq invasion.
After reading these three sources, you must decide if you think it is good for nations to pursue their national interests, or bad.
Hope this long explanation helped clarify the troubling question for you!
Answer:
I need to see the options to answer this question
Explanation:
<span>The Bonus Army was the name given to Veterans who
asked the government for early we-related payments. It was an army of 43,000
marchers who gathered in Washington D.C. in 1932. They demanded cash-payment
redemption for their service certificates. The assembly was led by Walter W.
Waters, a former army sergeant.</span>
