Answer: the correct answer is A. He could say, "Hey, at least I'm doing good work volunteering at the homeless shelter" (assuming that being a good volunteer is important to him).
Explanation:
He also might convince himself that the flirting was harmless; thinking about how proud he is to be a pre-med student
.
My answer for this question would be AGREE. Yes, I don't like to work with ignorant people. Ignorance is a choice. Ignorance can be avoided when you have the eagerness to learn. Ignorance is like an excuse for those people who are lazy enough to learn and people like these are considered a liability.
The answer<span> to this </span>question<span> is </span>external<span> validity. The </span>medical doctor<span> who </span>carried out<span> the </span>research much more likely regarded<span> to be </span>sensitive<span> to </span>the issue<span> of </span>external<span> validity. E</span>xternal<span> validity is the validity inferences in </span>scientific studies<span> and </span>it is usually primarily based<span> on experiments as experimental validity.</span>
Yes, if the biospecimens are de-identified then the research is no longer considered human subjects research.
Option: C
Explanation:
It is in the norms that in same type of research, both the researchers need to maintain some ethics and rules that if they do same type of experiments and use same materials they should acknowledge the other or take permission before doing that.
Here researcher A is conducting research on emphysema using bio specimen from human subjects and researcher B is doing research on lung cancer. He also need bio specimen. But as it is mentioned in the consent form that specimen is de identified so no problem for researcher B in using same specimen like researcher A.
