Answer:
c. It should process further because the reduction in the cost of the trees is irrelevant.
Explanation:
For the purpose of this Decision,
Benefit of processing further = Sales Value after processing – Sale Value before processing – Further Processing costs
Cost of acquiring trees is a sunk cost already incurred and hence is not relevant
Hence, benefit of processing = (0.80-0.20)*350 – 50
= $160
Hence, the answer is
c. It should process further because the reduction in the cost of the trees is irrelevant.
Answer:
<u>Sustainable</u>
Explanation:
Sustainable development in simple terms refers to the development which can be sustained or carried forward for a long period of time.
It refers to satisfying and meeting the needs of the current generation without jeopardizing the needs and resource availability for the future generations.
Economic development refers to the rise in per capita income while sustainable development incorporates economic as well as human development.
Such development aims at judicious usage of resources , equitable distribution of resources and reduction in wastage.
Answer:
1. AirEurope should produce if it wants to maximize its profit.
2. False
Explanation:
New payoffs after subsidy:
Aircraft/ AirEurope Produce Not Produce
Produce -3 , <u>6</u> 75 , 0
Not Produce 0 , 74 0 , 0
With a $9 million subsidy, regardless of whether Aircraft produces or not, AirEurope should<u> produce</u> if it wants to maximize its profit.
The statement is false (Aircraft would earn a negative payoff if it enters).
Answer:
Please check the info below
Explanation:
1. For Osaka
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 792000 / $9900000 *100
= 8.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 9900000 / $ 2475000 * 100
= 4.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 8% *4 %
= 32.00%
Hence the correct answer is 32.00%
For Yokohama :
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 2900000 / $ 29000000*100
= 10.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 29000000 / $ 14500000* 100
= 2.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 10% *2 %
= 20.00%
Hence the correct answer is 20.00%
2. The correct answer is
Osaka = $ 371,250
Yokohama = $ 435,000
3. The correct answer is No
This is because since Osaka has a higher ROI, Yokohama’s greater amount of residual income is not an indication that it is better managed