1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kati45 [8]
3 years ago
8

The Enlightenment and the Great Awaking caused:

History
1 answer:
mart [117]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: B: an increased interest in book and learning.

Explanation: people started to see its more than just religion

You might be interested in
What nation settled the most land in Central and South America?​
Romashka [77]

Answer:

I believe it is Spain.   Please correct me if I am wrong.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Why didn’t Jefferson capitalize the word “united” in the phrase “united States of America”
agasfer [191]
He was making a commentary on the political division in the country.
3 0
3 years ago
Which statement correctly describes a difference between Japanese and European immigration to the United States during the early
elena-s [515]

Answer:D

Explanation: “The gentlemen’s agreement”

4 0
3 years ago
What change was occurring in 1990 that most likely explains why the United States responded differently to the second crisis tha
FinnZ [79.3K]
The Iranian army was,preparing to invade Iraq
6 0
3 years ago
How did different religious groups gain protection under Muslim rulers?
Rzqust [24]

Answer:

To begin, we need to first grasp the basic terminology relevant to the study of religious minorities. Religious minorities are known as dhimmīs, short for ahl al-dhimmah, or people of the dhimmah, a term that later became synonymous with the People of the Book.[4] The original meaning of al-dhimmah, however, meant protection, and it was often short for dhimmat–Allah wa-rasūlih, or the “protection of God and His Prophet.”[5] In short, the concept originally had a divine connotation, or a meaning that was directly related to the power of God. However, the concept soon morphed into a technical legal term with the progression of classical scholarship, and it consequently lost its transcendent dimension.[6] As a result, ahl al-dhimmah, or people of the dhimmah, has become a legal term and not a reference to the recipients of divine protection. It is important to discuss the etymology of the word because it demonstrates the significance of the people of the dhimmah who, at the very root of it all, are people who were to be protected on behalf of God and His Prophet ﷺ – an immense responsibility. This status is awarded to People of the Book (who according to many scholars includes Zoroastrians and others) who agree through contract to pay the jizyah, or poll-tax, in exchange for that protection.[7] In sum, the formation of the people of the dhimmah was rooted in religious minorities paying a tax that exempted them from military service. Much more nuance can be embedded within all of these terms that are sometimes highly contested among scholars, but considering the limited scope of this paper, we will move forward to address the larger picture at hand.

The power of the Muslim state was dependent on its ability to provide two precious resources to its people: security and justice.[8] Christians and Jews and other minorities were not technically citizens of the Muslim state; they were considered outsiders under the protection of the state, leading to the title of dhimmah, or protected people.[9] Their protection was guaranteed in a number of ways: by providing them with legal autonomy – meaning they could maintain their religious practices without interference – and protection during war. That said, there have no doubt been incidents throughout history in which that protection was threatened or revoked and the Muslim ruler engaged in persecution of religious minorities.[10] The fact remains, however, that there was never widespread systematic persecution of Christians, for example, in the Islamic world as there was in the late Roman Empire.[11] And the hostile circumstances that did occasionally arise, were not due to Islamic legislation per se, but were rather a result of an amalgam of social, political, and economic circumstances. So while Christians historically at times suffered at the hands of Muslims, it was almost never a result of their being Christian, or their beliefs, but a result of various factors related to the pursuit of power.[12]

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Congress can override a president's veto by a __________ vote of both the house of representatives and the senate.
    13·1 answer
  • who treated the blacks bad by torturing them into not voting was it (a). ku klux Klan (b). literacy tests (c). jim crow laws (d)
    11·1 answer
  • How did Americans try to “civilize” Native Americans?
    5·2 answers
  • What important letter was wrote from the foraging office on November 2, 1917
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following could be a plot's resolution?
    12·2 answers
  • why did stephen douglas use the principle of popular sovereignty to win passage of the Kansas -Nebraska bill. ​
    5·2 answers
  • 20 Points! PLS HELP!
    15·2 answers
  • How did the Atlantic slave trade impact the Americas’ role in triangular trade?
    12·1 answer
  • During the early 1900’s, which event spurred the petroleum boom in Texas?
    7·2 answers
  • Someone pls help me I will make you Brainly
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!