The scenario illustrates the fact that the noticeable difference of a stimulus is constant even though there is a difference in their intensity.
<h3>
What is Weber's law?</h3>
This is a law that is known to quantify the changes that occur in a given stimulus.
The change here can be seen from the weight of the bags in the scenarios that concern the two individuals.
Read more on Weber's law here:
brainly.com/question/10461356
#SPJ12
Yeah huh" you have to explain what you wanted
Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
Give away gold and show kindness and wealth
Answer:
feel more effective.
Explanation:
In general sense, small groups are defined as group of people mostly three or a few more people, but not in large numbers (above twenty) who are together to achieve a common goal. For example, a group of talented guys, that forms a musical group for the purpose of realizing their musical or artistical dreams.
Some of the characteristics of small groups includes:
1. Shared identity
2. Results oriented approach
3. Interdependece
4. Competent team members
Hence, in comparison with the large groups, people in small groups tend to identify themselves with the core structures and goals of the group, there by less likely to take more than their equal share of available resources, which in turn makes them to FEEL MORE EFFECTIVE in general towards the success of the group.
