From my best educated guess, I'd have to say D is your answer. I'm not completely sure, however, I've heard it used a lot by people I know who work in that area when they're talking about foreign trade.
The answer is construct validity. This is used to associate and interrogation of causal claims. Through determining the variable, interrogation is already being done to see if the variables have an effect on what is being measured. This way construct validity is being done. Also, one variable can be studied in different angles to understand the degree of how it takes effect or how can it be associated.
Source
http://nortonbooks.typepad.com/files/research-methods-in-psychology-sample-chapter-3-1.pdf
Answer: The correct answer is : Using the 0.01 level of significance is not demanding enough. Using the true Bonferroni technique, the researchers would have to conclude that their 0.01 level was not quite demanding enough.
A Type I error is made when the null hypothesis is rejected when it is true. The probability of making a Type I error is alpha, which is the level of significance that one sets for his hypothesis test. An alpha of O.05 indicates that one is willing to accept a 5% probability of being wrong in rejecting the null hypothesis. If you want to reduce the risk, you need to use a lower value for alpha. The level of significance is the probability of making a Type I error that an investigator is willing to accept.
Those three primary rights are:
- <span>Personal security (which means that every person has the right to enjoy their life fully without being threaten/taken by others)
- Personal liberty (the right to choose the actions and directions of their life)
- Right of private property - (which is the right to obtain things such as house, land, factory, or other type of property)</span>
Answer:
if you if em yum am real this is to inform do it so we is
Explanation:
so us all is well it's so us so is so so
