The Declaration of Independence is divided into five parts: the preamble, the statement of philosophy, the grievances, the operative words, and the statement of the signers.
Islam varied greatly from Christianity and Buddhism since its founder was a religious figure as well as a political and military pioneer. In addition, from the start the Islamic community got itself constituted as a state. Along these lines, Islam did not create as plainly characterized a partition amongst church and state as did both Christianity and Buddhism. There were a few similitudes in their religious viewpoints: every one of the three religions were established by single historical figures who had intense religious experiences; each of the three give an unmistakable way to salvation; and each of the three announce the equality of all believers. however, Islam's origination of monotheism was more grounded than that of Christianity; and every religion was shaped to some extent by the social conventions in which it developed.
Answer:
The Supreme Court decision that decided the 2000 Presidential Election should go down in history as one of the court's most ill-conceived judgments. In issuing its poorly-reasoned ruling in Bush v. Gore, the court majority unnecessarily exposed itself to charges of partisanship and risked undermining the court's stature as an independent, impartial arbiter of the law. Although the court majority correctly identified constitutional problems in the specific recount proceedings ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, the decision to end all recount attempts did immeasurable damage to the equal protection rights the court claimed to be guarding, since it favored a convenient and timely tabulation of ballots over an accurate recording of the vote. In the controversy that followed this decision, some critics of the majority decision argued that the court had no business taking on Bush v. Gore in the first place, that it should have remained solely within the Florida courts (Ginsburg, J. [Dissent] Bush v. Gore [2000]). This paper will argue that the court was correct to intervene but that umm the resulting decision was flawed and inconsistent, with potentially serious, adverse implications for the Federal judiciary if the court continues to issue rulings in this way.
Explanation:
Answer:
yes
Explanation:Public opinion polls are used in marketing to track the popularity of a political candidate.
