Answer:
Archduke Franz Ferdinand Carl Ludwig Joseph Maria of Austria (18 December 1863 – 28 June 1914) was the heir presumptive to the throne of Austria-Hungary.[1] His assassination in Sarajevo is considered the most immediate cause of World War I.
Over the ownership of the Jordan River's water resources, Jordan and Israel were at odds constantly.
Briefing:-
Jordan and Israel engaged in a protracted dispute over Jordan River water rights up until the 1990s. Sharing water from the Jordan-river system has proven to be a significant issue between Israel, Syria, and Jordan. Three noteworthy border clashes occurred in 1965, with Syrian troops firing Israeli farmers and army patrols in each incident. Israeli tanks and artillery then destroyed the massive earthmovers deployed by the Arabs as a distraction.
<h3>Which river separates Israel from Jordan?</h3>
Downstream of the Sea of Galilee, the Jordan River runs through Israel before forming the border with Jordan. The Yarmouk, on the other hand, rises in Syria and flows through Jordan, Israel, and into the Sea of Galilee before joining the Jordan River.
To Know more about Jordan River's
brainly.com/question/21246027
#SPJ9
Answer:
well its in english so, it is the americans
Explanation:
La Follette voted for Wilson’s progressive measures but resisted U.S. involvement in World War I. He voted against the declaration of war in 1917. He voted against bills creating a military draft and authorizing the use of borrowed money to meet war costs. Senators attacked him for disloyalty, and he was in danger of receiving censure. But the war ended and Republicans needed his vote to control the Senate. As a result, the censure move died. After the war he opposed the Treaty of Versailles and League of Nations. He felt the treaty would lead only to “an unjust peace which could only lead to future wars.”
Answer:
<u>Integration of Indians in American society</u>
Explanation:
The federal government has almost adopted an act that has further damaged India's interests even more fundamentally. Dawes Act of 1887 intended, to assist the Indians by staying on their land and integrating them into American society. This had a very different effect.
The act laid down the conditions that would give back to the Indians their common rights to their tribal land and instead individual estates of 160 acres (the value of the land was granted by white settlers). Any surplus land in the territory will be sold, and the proceeds will go to the tribes.
This plan was doomed to fail over a short period of time because it was impossible for hunters and warriors to quickly transform into farmers. In the long run, this had the effect of giving the Indians about two-thirds of the 138 million acres of land reserved for them. The energy with which white settlers ransacked free land is clearly evident in Native American territory, first on the reserves.