1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
r-ruslan [8.4K]
3 years ago
9

“The more power a government has, the more it can act arbitrarily according to the whims and desires of the elite, and the more

it will make war on others and murder its foreign and domestic subjects. The more constrained the power of governments, the more power is diffused, checked, and balanced, the less it will aggress on others and commit mass violence. At the extremes of power, totalitarian governments slaughter their people by the tens of millions. In contrast, many democracies can barely bring themselves to execute even serial murderers.”
-Rudolph Rummel, United States political scientist, Death by Government, 1994

Identify ONE historical example of mass violence that was committed by a totalitarian state in the twentieth century that would support Rummel’s argument in the passage.

Explain ONE historical example of a democratic state committing mass violence that would challenge Rummel’s argument regarding democracies and mass violence.

Explain ONE development in the late twentieth century that likely shaped Rummel’s view of the relationship between democracy and mass violence.
History
1 answer:
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

a) One historical example of mass violence that was committed by a totalitarian state in the

twentieth century that would support Rummel’s argument would be the Holocaust. The

totalitarian leader was Adolf Hitler. The Holocaust is an example of mass violence as thousands

of people were killed due to totalitarian society

b) One historical example of a democratic state committing mass violence that would

challenge Rummel’s argument regarding democracies and mass violence would be African

resistance to European rule. Democratic European states like Britain disobeyed their principles

when they crushed African resistance to European rule through mass violence.

c)One development in the late twentieth century that likely shaped Rummel’s view of the

relationship between democracy and mass violence would be the spread of communism. Death

under communism occurred as a result of its cruel projects and social engineering. Communism

was relation between democracy and mass violence

You might be interested in
What led to the American involvement in the Great War?
shutvik [7]
U.S.<span> declared </span>war<span> on April 6th, 1917, the </span>U.S.<span> had desperately tried to stay neutral, but ties to Britain, propaganda, the sinking of ships by German U-boats, and a German attempt in the Zimmermann Note to </span>get<span> Mexico to declare </span>war<span> on the </span>U.S.<span> pushed the </span>U.S.<span> to </span>get involved<span>.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were some political reasons for colonizing
sp2606 [1]

Answer:

ENCOURAGEMENT FROM RULERS British monarchs encouraged the development of colonies as new sources of wealth and power. They granted charters to groups of businessmen, like the Virginia Company, who offered to help colonists settle in the “New World.” Economic - Concerns money and wealth.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Why is the the war of 1812 known as the 'second war of american independence'?
Murrr4er [49]
Because like the first American revolution, we were fighting the British 
3 0
3 years ago
The __________ Tariff Act was a disaster because when European nations responded with tariffs on American goods global trade plu
eduard
It was the "Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act" that was a disaster because when European nations responded with tariffs on American goods global trade plunged by roughly two thirds <span> from 1929 levels.</span> This was viewed as exacerbating the Great Depression.
4 0
3 years ago
The Judiciary Act of 1789....
tia_tia [17]
Hi there!

The Judiciary Act of 1789...

C. Allowed John Marshall to become the Chief Justice

The office of Chief Justice did not exist prior to the Judiciary Act of 1789 and established the office. This in turn allowed John Marshall to become the chief justice. The other options, while true in history, are not related to the Judiciary Act of 1789.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What were the goals of the Allied occupation of Japan? (multipul choice)
    15·1 answer
  • Between 1805 and 1807, Napoleon defeated armies from all of the following countries EXCEPT:
    14·1 answer
  • Question 1.) The first shots of the revolutionary war rang out in which two colonial towns?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following best states the main purpose of the Ten Commandments ?
    5·1 answer
  • 5. Which type of thermal energy uses electromagnetic waves to transfer energy?
    10·2 answers
  • How did watergate affect American public opinion
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about plantations is FALSE?
    12·2 answers
  • write a sentence relating to the early colonist that includes the words dissent, persecute, and tolerance.
    6·1 answer
  • Arrange the events leading to women's suffrage throughout the United States in chronological order.
    11·1 answer
  • *<br> . Inventions such as the astrolabe and the compass made sea travel
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!