Answer:
Soviets emphasized identifying likely allies and giving them financial aid and munitions
Explanation:
Soviet Union-Africa relations covers the diplomatic, political, military and cultural relationships between the Soviet Union and Africa, from the 1945 to 1992. Joseph Stalin made Africa a very low priority, and discouraged relationships or studies of the continent. However the decolonization process of the 1950s and early 1960s opened new opportunities, which Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev was eager to exploit. The Kremlin developed four major long-term policy goals: 1) To gain a lasting presence on the continent. 2) To gain a voice in African affairs. 3) To undermine Western/NATO influence, especially by identifying capitalism with Western imperialism. 4) After 1962, it fought hard to prevent communist China from developing its own countervailing presence. At no time was Moscow willing to engage in combat in Africa, although its ally Cuba did so. Indeed the Kremlin at first assumed that the Russian model of socialized development would prove attractive to Africans eager to modernize. That did not happen, and instead the Soviets emphasized identifying likely allies and giving them financial aid and munitions, as well as credits to purchase from the Soviet bloc. Although some countries, such as Angola and Ethiopia, became allies for a while, the connections proved temporary. With the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Russian influence greatly diminished.
It is considered the most significant among the many cultural contributions of the Sumerians and the greatest among those of the Sumerian city of Uruk which advanced the writing of cuneiform
Poland was bordered by both the Soviet Union and Germany making it an easy target from both sides.
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
1. The reaction to the Allotment act of 1887 was that "Few Native Americans accepted the individual plots of land, thereby reducing the quantity of land belonging to Native Americans, while the rest were sold off to the white settlers"
2. It was believed that the purpose of the Dawes Act of 1887 was to assist the Indians to incorporate into the white culture in no difficult manner and ultimately enhance their quality of life. However, the result of the Dawes Act of 1887 didn't promote the purpose of the Act.
This is because it left many of them homeless and resent the US government more, thereby leading to conflict between the Native Americans and the US government.
Hence, I disagree with the result.
Answer:The British presence in India began through trade. Men like Robert Clive of the British East India Company combined military prowess with a ruthless ambition and became fabulously wealthy. With wealth came power, and traders took control of huge swathes of India.
Explanation:Hope this helped u also may i plz have brainlist?
