What was your reaction to the Allotment act of 1887? Do you agree or disagree with the results?

History

1 answer:

ipn [44]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

1. The reaction to the Allotment act of 1887 was that "Few Native Americans accepted the individual plots of land, thereby reducing the quantity of land belonging to Native Americans, while the rest were sold off to the white settlers"

2. It was believed that the purpose of the Dawes Act of 1887 was to assist the Indians to incorporate into the white culture in no difficult manner and ultimately enhance their quality of life. However, the result of the Dawes Act of 1887 didn't promote the purpose of the Act.

This is because it left many of them homeless and resent the US government more, thereby leading to conflict between the Native Americans and the US government.

Hence, I disagree with the result.

You might be interested in

(bottom one)

laila [671]

Answer:

hii there

Privates in the Continental army earned about $6.25 a month. To entice soldiers to join the army, Congress, states and towns offered a bounty, which was a one-time payment of money or a grant of land, upon enlistment. Paymasters simply introduced what was called a 'stoppage' in a soldier's

Explanation:

hope it helps

have a nice day :)

7 0

2 years ago

What was a result of the War of 1812?

Flura [38]

B. The answer is B i need 20 characters B

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

During their early histories, ______ sometimes influenced Chinese government, while ______ sometimes influenced Indian governmen

Grace [21]

Confucianism, Buddhism
would be my best guess... but out of the answers you listed they probably want Daoism and Confucianism.

Since Shinto is Japanese and Hinduism is Indian... those two are completely out of the question.
_____
Daoism isn't really a government influence... it embraces the philosophy of yin and yang. Good and Bad, without one the other cannot exist. Natural influences of a good and bad government doesn't really make a good governing philosophy. Confucianism was really based on good and virtuous, people live life in harmony and proprietary. He's missing the rules and laws of the Legalist system of government. Where it assumes all people are bad and without laws and rules everything would be in chaos. The First Emperor established the Legalist system in China, he was said to have buried alive hundreds of Confucian scholars and burned Confucian books... His reign was short lived, only 14 years. The next dynasty... the Han, governed with a combination of Legalist and Confucian type of government, lasted 426 years. This pretty much continued till the Tang dynasty when Buddhism a larger influence in society.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which principles of democracy are not followed in an authoritarian state.

Travka [436]

The correct answer should be something like equality, or equity, but mostly it is the right of the people to choose their own representatives. In authoritarian states the rulers are usually not chosen by the people and impose their will without the opinion of the people.

5 0

3 years ago

Should the colonies separate from the British empire? Provide reasons for your answer.

nadezda [96]

The colonists should Seperate from the British Empire because the King of England was unfair towards the people in the colonies. The Colonist were in need of a new Government to have rights that they didn't have before.

7 0

2 years ago