I think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted is more appropriate.
<h3>Who is a Defendant?</h3>
This is referred to as the individual or group which have been accused of breaking the law and is being tried in court.
It is more appropriate for the defendants to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted because the jury will employ the use of evidences and testimonies in other to give a verdict. This ensures fair judgement and prevent innocent from being punished unjustly.
Read more about Defendant here brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ1
Answer:
Polymers contain two or more atoms
Answer:
Corpus delicti literally means the body or substance of the crime. In law the term refers to proof establishing that a crime has occurred. Testimony that a ship's passenger pushed the deceased overboard can establish the corpus delicti of murder even if the body is never recovered.
Explanation:
There are several serial killers that ether got life in prison or the death sentence
B. Because the Judge has to listen to presented case before favoring either side.