The Daimyo gained power because they ran the government and distributed the rice crop.
The <u>Daimyo of Japan</u>:
- owned large areas of land
- taxed the peasants who farmed their lands for rice
- ruled their areas of Japan even though they were under the Shogun and Emperor
Because they owned such large amount of land, they were effectively the rulers of Japan as they controlled activities in their areas.
They also distributed the rice crop by taxing it and selling it with proceeds used for various things in Japanese society such as building roads.
In conclusion therefore, we can say that the Daimyo gained power by running their areas of Japan and controlling rice.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/199016.</em>
Aboard the Mayflower on the way to the colonies, he created the Mayflower Compact which was the first "governing paper" this creating and changing the government of Massachusetts into what was agreed upon by him and his fellow pilgrims aboard. So, B.
Explanation:
Congress is Unable to Control Commerce Between America and Foreign Nations. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress lacked the authority to regulate commerce, making it unable to protect or standardize trade between foreign nations and the various states.
Answer: In a way, yes
Explanation:
The Cold War was a period of extreme tension for both countries involved, for they were on the constant lookout for each other’s actions and decisions. Fear of a nuclear attack seeped into the nation with ease and this caused people to live in constant anxiety, for no one really knew when and if war would break out. Freedom and liberty can be presented in many ways, and in this case, people’s freedom from fear and anxiousness was taken away. The government had to keep constant monitoring and this also took away privacy, so that’s a lil extra to it.
Advantage---Loose constructionists tend to uphold civil rights and liberties. Judicially active, loose constructionist judges such as Ruth Bader Ginsburg tend to dissent in cases which infringe civil liberties such as Salinas v Texas (2013) and agree with rulings that don't e.g. 2015 Same sex rulingAdvantage---Loose constructionists often protect minorities, especially those incompatible with Congress or the executive. This is because loose constructionists are not scared to overturn laws or actions made by Congress or the executive e.g. Brown v Board of EducationDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be judicially active, which has fuelled arguments on the politicisation of the Court. They 'legislate from the bench' by striking down laws as unconstitutional. This is undemocratic and elitist, as they have mandate from the electorateDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be too sensitive to public opinion, which could hamper the neutrality and independence of the Court. However, some public support is necessary to maintain the authority of the Court.
