Answer:
Identity versus role confusion
Intimacy versus isolation
Explanation:
Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development proposes that people pass through a series of stages centered on social and emotional development. At each point in a person’s life, he or she faces a developmental conflict that must be resolved. People who overcome these conflicts are able to achieve psychological skills that ultimately last the rest of a person’s life. Those who fail to master these challenges will continue to struggle.
The adolescent struggle to get an identify for themselves and be more certain about the role life would have them play while the young adult struggle with the need to create intimacy or end up being in isolation.
Answer:
colonists shouldn't have to pay taxes to the British
Answer:
Sugauli treaty was a treaty that defined the borders of Nepal after its expansion to other territories and conflicts with other countries aroused. It was established on the 2nd of December 1815.
Explanation:
The Sugauli treaty established the borders of Nepal after conflicts with the East India Company took place. Nepal and the East India Company signed a treaty that defined the limits of Nepal. As a consequence, Nepal lost some of its territories. The Sugauly treaty was signed on December 2, 1815, and ratified on March 4, 1816.
This is a very philosophical question, so it requires your own opinions and reasoning. I will help as much as I can for you to develop your thoughts, but I cannot write them for you.
One of the most important things for you to reference in question two is the natural state of man. How was it like? Are we peaceful and individualistic, as John Locke states in <em>Two Treatise of Government</em>, or are humans selfish and natural life would be "nasty, brutish, and short" as Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes state in <em>The Prince </em>and <em>The Leviathan </em>(respective titles)? Why is this so?
These philosophers also give a reason as to why government is necessary for humankind. For Locke, it is to protect the people from larger threats. For Hobbes, it is to make man civilized. For Machiavelli, it is for a leader to align their self-interest with those of the people and make a prosperous community.
If you need any more help, ask me! I hope this helps :)
A. increases.
I hope it’s right :P
