1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Amiraneli [1.4K]
3 years ago
13

Which people were never intended to be included in this statement

History
1 answer:
sammy [17]3 years ago
5 0

You need to give me more info

You might be interested in
What kind of relationship did the soviet union have with the united states in 1945 apex?
padilas [110]
It was a good one in fact, They were good allies in WWII despite one being capitalist (USA) and the other communist (USSR). Their relationships weakened after WWII.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What organization planned to create separate Jewish and Arab states in Palestine following World War II?
GuDViN [60]

Answer:

United Nation was the organization which planed to create separate Jewish and Arab States in Palestine following World War II.

Explanation: 'The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine' was a proposal by United Nation which stated two separate country for for Jewish and the Palestine. The resolution was adopted in 1947 and it was adopted as the Resolution 181(II).

The partition plan was suggested a separate country for Arabs and the Jewish and the end of the British mandate. The resolution was combined of four parts which also recommended to remove the troops peacefully.

The plan also suggested an economic union for the proposed states and a commission for the religion and the minority group.

4 0
3 years ago
What was Patrick Henry’s reaction to the Stamp Act?
puteri [66]

Patrick Henry, at a meeting of the Virginia House of Burgesses, proposed seven resolutions against the Stamp Act. The first four resolutions were adopted and passed by the House of Burgesses. The Fifth resolution was repealed on the second day of the debates. Though resolutions six and seven were never passed by the House, all seven were widely reported in the colonial press, giving the impression that all passed the Virginia Assembly.

The following four resolves were adopted by the House of Burgesses on May 30, 1765:

Resolved, that the first adventurers and settlers of His Majesty's colony and dominion of Virginia brought with them and transmitted to their posterity, and all other His Majesty's subjects since inhabiting in this His Majesty's said colony, all the liberties, privileges, franchises, and immunities that have at any time been held, enjoyed, and possessed by the people of Great Britain.

Resolved, that by two royal charters, granted by King James I, the colonists aforesaid are declared entitled to all liberties, privileges, and immunities of denizens and natural subjects to all intents and purposes as if they had been abiding and born within the Realm of England.

Resolved, that the taxation of the people by themselves, or by persons chosen by themselves to represent them, who can only know what taxes the people are able to bear, or the easiest method of raising them, and must themselves be affected by every tax laid on the people, is the only security against a burdensome taxation, and the distinguishing characteristic of British freedom, without which the ancient constitution cannot exist.

Resolved, that His Majesty's liege people of this his most ancient and loyal colony have without interruption enjoyed the inestimable right of being governed by such laws, respecting their internal policy and taxation, as are derived from their own consent, with the approbation of their sovereign, or his substitute; and that the same has never been forfeited or yielded up, but has been constantly recognized by the kings and people of Great Britain.

<span>The following version of the much-debated fifth resolution (which was not adopted) was found with Patrick Henry's will:</span>

Resolved, therefor that the General Assembly of this Colony have the only and exclusive Right and Power to lay Taxes and Impositions upon the inhabitants of this Colony and that every Attempt to vest such Power in any person or persons whatsoever other than the General Assembly aforesaid has a manifest Tendency to destroy British as well as American Freedom.

<span>The following two resolutions were not</span> passed by the Virginia Assembly, but were reported in several newspapers:

Resolved, That His Majesty's liege people, the inhabitants of this Colony, are not bound to yield obedience to any law or ordinance whatever, designed to impose any taxation whatsoever upon them, other than the laws or ordinances of the General Assembly aforesaid.

Resolved, That any person who shall, by speaking or writing, assert or maintain that any person or persons other than the General Assembly of this Colony, have any right or power to impose or lay any taxation on the people here, shall be deemed an enemy to His Majesty's Colony.

7 0
3 years ago
How did the US Congress respond to the signing of the SALT II (Strategic Arms Limitation Talks) treaty?
prohojiy [21]

Answer:

SALT II was the second series of Strategic Arms Limitation Talks between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The talks opened in Geneva in September 1972 to complete the agreement on strategic defensive weapons. The agreement for the limitation of the construction of nuclear weapons was reached in Vienna on June 18, 1979, but with the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan, on the eve of Christmas 1979, there were harsh reactions on a global scale, especially on the American side.  

On 3 January 1980, Carter proposed to the Senate to postpone indefinitely the ratification of the SALT II treaty. Then he took a series of restrictive measures, including the suspension of the planned sales of grain, culminating then in the announcement that the American athletes would not take part in the XXII Olympics, to be held in Moscow on the summer of 1980. With the increasing tensions at the beginning of the eighties, the great powers accused each other of betraying the agreements made, but this did not prevent the negotiations for the reduction of strategic weapons, albeit with continuous interruptions, to resume until reaching the START agreements (START I and START II).

7 0
3 years ago
What do you think was the main reason behind the civil war in america
elixir [45]
Slavery and the power of federal government led to a war in america
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Select ALL that apply.
    8·2 answers
  • What did the seneca falls convention inspire amelia bloomer to do?
    15·2 answers
  • What is Renaissance?​
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following actions were stepping stones to the Revolution? (Choose two answers)
    15·1 answer
  • 7. At the Constitutional Convention of 1787, supporters of the Virginia plan and supporters of the New Jersey plan differed over
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an organization formed in 1948 to promote democracy, economic cooperation, and human rights?
    12·1 answer
  • : Put the following events in chronological order.
    8·1 answer
  • Help me please..,...
    15·2 answers
  • What level of govt in federalism has the heights level of power
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the anti federalists finally agree to ratify the constitution
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!