1.melody short phrases, large leaps
Towards the end of the past century composers as Steve Reich La Monte Young, Philip Glass, they began to explore what is now called minimalism, in which the music is stripped down to its most fundamental features; the music often features repetition and iteration. An early example is Terry Riley's In C from 1964, perhaps a random work in which short phrases are chosen by the musicians from a set list and played an arbitrary number of times, while the note C is repeated in quavers behind them. Philip Glass works are on the most representative perhaps also featuring as soundtracks of movies.
2, harmony mixed meter
This caused a very new sensation with an extreme irregular rhytm. While time signatures usually express a regular pattern of beat stresses continuing through a piece (sometimes a section), sometimes composers place a different time signature at the beginning of each bar, resulting in music with an extremely irregular rhythmic feel.
Examples;Promenade -- Modest Mussorgsky's Pictures at an Exhibition (1874) The opening already shows signs of this implement
3· rhythm atonality
Atonality first began as a pejorative term to condemn music in which chords were organized seemingly with no apparent coherence. the term describes music that does not conform to the system of tonal hierarchies that were traditionally seen in classical European music between the 1700's and 1900'a centuries Example; ending Schoenberg's "George Lieder" Op. 15/1
4.dynamics extremes
some pieces started to use additional markings of further emphasis. Extreme dynamic markings introduced an extreme range of loudness, or, and sometimes accompanied with very small differences of loudness within a normal range, this huge change was made possible with the orchestration of the work, usually using many loud instruments like brass and percussion playing at once. It became more widespread in late 1900s.
Im kinda stuck on this one.....but due to the " Empire " I believe its Imperialism. I hope this helps!! :D
Answer:
this clause states that united states
Answer:
I dont know if this is an optional choice question if so this is probabaly wrong on the ABCD scale so you can report this but otherwise if not:
People make up there mind with the knowledge of there own opinions and what <em>is</em><em> </em>factual to them so to change there minds is because it is based on other peoples opinions and this makes sense ( the easiest way to explain it is as if its a filter going through this persons brain and them identifying if this is factual to them or not in <em>their</em> opinion) to them so, after they go through this process of <em>proving</em> this other information that they held so kindly to there truth, <em>wrong</em> this suddenly changes there mind. By what they think is factual enough to believe <em>at least to them. </em><em>It</em><em> </em><em>can</em><em> </em><em>be</em><em> </em><em>diffe</em><em>rent</em><em> </em><em>for</em><em> </em><em>everyone</em><em> </em><em>else</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
Answer: lack of authority to enforce laws
Explanation:
during Reconstruction the Freedmen's Bureau was heavily supported by African-Americans. This was because this federal agency helped in aiding African-Americans with job opportunities and other services. This shows that statement one is incorrect.
