This is a dumb question. If he has a typical amount of healthy brains in his head, then I should think he will perceive her behavior as totally inappropriate, especially for a work space. In the case that he does not see it this way, then it is safe to assume that he does NOT have a typical, healthy brain and will see her actions as an invitation to sensual activity.
Explanation:
Dr. Liz, specialist in orthodontics, carried out analysis studies regarding the information registered in the system, by the previous dentist, she could clearly notice that there was not a complete registry regarding the controls performed on the patients, there was an information disorder, and many times the information was not true regarding the patient's history; All this led to an in-depth investigation and it was found that there was definitely no distributional order regarding the patients that correspond to each of the EPS or entities to which the primary Ips provides the service.
However, Dr. Liz found that the problem of the lack of information began from the moment the Doctor made the registration, since on many occasions he did not have the appropriate tools to do it as a good computer since sometimes it had failures and the information was written on forms that many times, due to the number of patients, were recast or lost.
As a first step, it was necessary for the doctors to be made aware of the correct registration and to diligently attend to and detail the records of each patient; In addition also that the equipment and instruments necessary to collect the information were requested urgently, at the beginning, Liz said it was not easy, it was a total rejection, because joint work and collaboration were needed, in addition to the limitation of spaces and resources of the Ips seemed impossible to solve all those problems.
Finally, the medical evidence and the disagreement of the patients, due to the misinformation and lack of records, made it possible for concrete solutions to be given for the common benefit.
The results of Zimbardo's prison study do not lead to a firm conclusion for two reasons:
a. First of all, the experiment was intended to go on for two weeks. However, due to the experiment going out of hand, it had to be stopped within 6 days. This was because many of the people who were paying the role of prisoners started getting hit and abused. Some even developed psychosomatic rashes, others started suffering from other psychological disorders.
b. Many critics believe that the results were not very reliable since Zimbardo himself was part of the experiment (he played the role of the prison warden) and could have influenced the direction of the experiment.
The inherent variability of human categories makes stereotypes <u>much less useful </u>than they might otherwise be.
In social psychology, a stereotype is a generalized attitude about a certain group of people. People might make this presumption for each individual in a particular group.
Expectations can come in many different shapes; they may be related to a group's character, hobbies, looks, or abilities. Even when they are overgeneralized, untrustworthy, and resistant to new information, stereotypes can occasionally be accurate.
These generalizations about particular groups of people may be true when applied to specific individuals, but they may also be false, which is one of the root causes of bias.
Hence, option B is correct.
To learn more about Stereotype here
brainly.com/question/13281670
#SPJ4
