Religious factors should not justify going to war
Explanation:
Going to war is a complicated issue and is never completely justified not completely not justified for all the people of the country as there are multiple variables at play.
The absolute bloodbath of the second and first world war was considered justified by many even though it changed little in terms of the over all make up of the European societies except for the end of empires by the end of first world war.
It is often important to calculate if going to war is worth the damage it does and then the profit it pays off which is often a question of ideology.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
An exodus refers to a large group of people leaving a certain region and moving to another, an example of this would be the Jewish Exodus from Egypt.
hope this helped!
Answer:
The Monroe doctrine stated that the U.S. should use military force to prevent any form of intervention from an European power in the western hemisphere.
The Roosevelt corollary was different in that it allowed European powers to intervene as long as the intervention was considered justified, but not to invade.
This difference became clear during the Venezuelan crisis of 1902-1903, when Germany, Britain, and Italy imposed a naval blockade on Venezuela because the Venezuela president refused to pay for the damages suffered by European citizens during the recent civil war.
At first, Theodore Roosevelt allowed the blockade to continue because he believed that it was justified, but when Germany threatened to invade Venezuela, he intervened sending a fleet under Admiral George Dewey.
Answer:
That is called Supply and Demand. The company and customers have a relationship where the customer wants a product and the company supplies it. :)
