1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ulleksa [173]
3 years ago
11

What did the supreme court do about laws in georgia that took away the rights of the cherokee apex?

History
2 answers:
BabaBlast [244]3 years ago
5 0
In the court case, Cherokee Nation v. Georgia the Supreme Court declined to hear the case regarding the infringement of Cherokee peoples right's, as a result, the state of Georgia was able to maintain is state laws that limited the rights of Cherokee on their own lands. However, a later Supreme Court Ruling in a different case one year later, Worcester v. Georgia, saw the rights of the Cherokee as a sovereign entity restored, stopping the state of Georgia from enforcing any laws within the territory. 
Liono4ka [1.6K]3 years ago
4 0

It said the Georgia laws were unconstitutional. - Apex.

You might be interested in
Which line of latitude runs through Australia
Travka [436]
<span>The Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn each lie at 23.5 degrees latitude. The Tropic of Cancer is located at around 23.5° North of the equator and runs through Mexico, the Bahamas, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Oman, India, and southern China. hope this helps</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help, I will give twenty points for this!!
Snowcat [4.5K]

Answer: I think it would be 3 correct me if I’m wrong:)

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How did the competition of the transcontinental railroad affect companies that made products
Aleksandr [31]

The completion of the Transcontinental Railroad greatly affected companies that made products in that it made it far easier for them to transport their goods over long distances to markets, which greatly increased profits and output. 

5 0
3 years ago
how were the policies of massive retaliation and brinkmanship different from previous military policies?
Schach [20]
Previous military policies had created massive killings throughout long years on a war of aggression. Brinkmanship, as showed in history was used to let another country stop its war through massive retaliation. It is a more dangerous option to use nuclear weapons as a sign of power and capability to kill more people including civilians in a fast mode.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were two effects of the Navigation Acts?
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which scientist from the Renaissance period made significant scientific discoveries that laid the basis for scientists of the Sc
    15·2 answers
  • How did Clinton's presidency end? A. Clinton left office after serving two full terms. B. Clinton left office after his first te
    12·1 answer
  • When it comes to the American Revolution, which side had the strongest argument? Did Great Britain have legitimate reasons to ta
    15·1 answer
  • The SALT treaty did which of the following?
    8·2 answers
  • What would be a good historical image to use?
    9·1 answer
  • Study Image A and Image B closely. Then answer the following questions in one to three sentences. Part A In your own words, desc
    9·2 answers
  • Please help me!!!!!!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • What is meant by term sovereignty please help me
    5·1 answer
  • What Greek god was the Greek hero Odysseus a son of?
    10·2 answers
  • The corrupt bargain in the election of 1824 referred to:.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!