The statement which didn't contribute to the passage of the Eighteenth Amendment legislating Prohibition in 1919 is: D. the high death toll from alcohol-related automobile accidents.
<h3>What is the
Eighteenth Amendment?</h3>
The Eighteenth Amendment was typically as a result of the Progressive Era and it was proposed on the 18th of December, 1917 by U.S Congress and ratified on the 16th of January, 1919 by the requisite number of states in the United States of America.
The main purpose of the Eighteenth (18th) Amendment was to abolish the manufacturing, sales and transportation of alcohol within the United States of America.
However, the high death toll from alcohol-related automobile accidents didn't by any means contribute to the passage of the Eighteenth Amendment legislating Prohibition in 1919.
Read more on Eighteenth Amendment here: brainly.com/question/438236
Answer:
planets orbit the sun.
planets have moons that orbit around them
they are spherical
Explanation:
hope this helps
Japan's imperialism was justified as a way to protect East Asia from the West. The idea was that only by taking advantage of its neighbors, could Japan become economically powerful. And this economic power, along with safety, became very important to the country, more so than maintaining traditional Asian values. Because it was considered so important, any action was justified in order to achieve it.
Answer:
The southern states blocked funding
Explanation:
Answer: His master is crueler after finding religion than he was before.
Explanation:
Douglas considered his master as a cruel man. His master once went out for a christian camp meeting and in the course of the meeting, he surrendered his life to Christ. Due to this, Douglass hoped that this religious transformation would result in his master being less cruel toward his slaves, and this didn't turn out to be the case, rather the master became more cruel.
This is an irony, because Douglass experienced the opposite of his expectation. An irony is the expression of one's meaning by the use of language which normally signifies the opposite, usually for emphatic or humorous effect.