Answer:
Choice C makes the most logical sense.
Explanation:
The best example of a primary source among these options that you've mentioned is an interview with her dad who is a Vietnam veteran. She can get all the details she needs from a person who was actually there.
Answer: when a writer points to a problem caused by social customs without explicitly challenging those customs.
A social commentary is the use of rhetorical devices in order to comment on the problems of society. This is usually a critique, and it is intended to promote change or to appeal to people's sense of justice. However, when this commentary is done subconsciously, the writer points towards the problem but does not explicitly challenge the customs.
<span>analytical</span>
The statement "The writer always states the hypothesis at the beginning of a scientific paper" is True.
A hypothesis is a supposition made by the scientist. In order for a hypothesis to be a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires for it to be tested. If a hypothesis cannot be tested, it cannot be scientific hypothesis. It is important to state the hypothesis clearly at the beginning of a scientific paper. This enables the reader to understand the problem.
I think the answer is B. People concerned about the environment are likely to buy eco-cars. This may or may not be the correct answer. I think I got this wrong. Sorry if the answer isn't correct.
