All categories

3 years ago

McCann Co. has identified an investment project with the following cash flows.

Business

2 answers:

Vlada [557]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Present values @ 11%

Years Present Value

1 $775

2 $982

3 $1075

4 $1070

Present values @ 16%

Years Present Value

1 $741

2 $899

3 $942

4 $897

Present values @ 30%

Years Present Value

1 $662

2 $716

3 $669

4 $569

Explanation:

Cash flows that will be received in future do not have same value as today, because if received today there is an opportunity to reinvest it and get some return. For this reason we calculate the present value of future cash flow.

Discounting method is used to calculate the present values. using following formula of discounting we calculate the PV.

PV = FV / ( 1 + r )^n

Present values @ 11%

Years Cash Flows Discounting Present Value

1 $860 860 x ( 1 + 11%)^-1 $775

2 $1,210 1,210 x ( 1 + 11%)^-2 $982

3 $1,470 1,470 x ( 1 + 11%)^-3 $1075

4 $1,625 1,625 x ( 1 + 11%)^-4 $1070

Present values @ 16%

Years Cash Flows Discounting Present Value

1 $860 860 x ( 1 + 16%)^-1 $741

2 $1,210 1,210 x ( 1 + 16%)^-2 $899

3 $1,470 1,470 x ( 1 + 16%)^-3 $942

4 $1,625 1,625 x ( 1 + 16%)^-4 $897

Present values @ 30%

Years Cash Flows Discounting Present Value

1 $860 860 x ( 1 + 30%)^-1 $662

2 $1,210 1,210 x ( 1 + 30%)^-2 $716

3 $1,470 1,470 x ( 1 + 30%)^-3 $669

4 $1,625 1,625 x ( 1 + 30%)^-4 $569

As the discount rate increase the Present value of the cash flows decreases because of discounting factor.

Ugo [173]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The present value at 11% is $3,902.13,$3,479.85 at 16% and $2,615.57 at 30%

Explanation:

The present value formula is given as :

PV=FV/(1+r)^n

Where FV is the future value of cash flows such as the ones given in the question

r is the rate of return at 11%,16% and 30%

n is the applicable time horizon relevant to each of the cash flow.

Find attached spreadsheet for detailed calculations.

Download xlsx

You might be interested in

Mark tells Leslie that his stereo has quadraphonic speakers because he was told that when he bought it. Leslie buys the stereo,

Gemiola [76]

Answer:

Yes, because the statement was false.

Explanation:

Breach of warranty is defined as a misrepresentation of the quality or type of a product. The seller fails to fulfil a promise or claim made during a transaction.

When a good is being sold there are certain assertions which the seller must stand behind.

In this scenario Mark tells Leslie that his stereo has quadraphonic speakers because he was told that when he bought it.

The fact that the stereo did not have quadrophinic speakers should have been discovered and stated by Mark. The misinformation he got when buying the stereo does not clear him of breach of warranty

6 0

2 years ago

You are helping a customer who wants to purchase pavers and they have selected

IrinaVladis [17]

Answer:

D. Ask the customer if they need any other products for the project.

Explanation:

Customers who buy pavers are usually involved in a medium or large house project, and probably need other products. For this reason, a sales representative should ask the customer if they need anything else for the project in order to increase sales for the company.

7 0

3 years ago

During the year, Belyk Paving Co. had sales of $2,560,000. Cost of goods sold, administrative and selling expenses, and deprecia

scoundrel [369]

Answer:

Net income -$268,000

Operating Cash Flow $511,000

Explanation:

A. Calculation for the Net income

INCOME STATEMENT

Sales $2,560,000

Cost of goods sold $1,364,000

Other expenses $685,000

Depreciation $477,000

EBIT $34,000

Interest $302,000

Taxable income -$ 268,000

($34,000-$302,000)

Taxes (24%) 0

Net income -$268,000

CALCULATION FOR EBIT

Sales $2,560,000

LESS:Cost of goods sold ($1,364,000)

Other expenses ($685,000)

Depreciation ($477,000)

EBIT $34,000

Based on the information given we were told that we should ignore any tax loss which was why Taxes (24%) was $0

The taxes are zero since we are ignoring any carryback or carryforward provisions.

Therefore NET INCOME is -$268,000

B. Calculation for operating cash flow

Using this formula

Operating Cash Flow = EBIT + Depreciation - Taxes

Let plug in the formula

Operating Cash Flow= $34,000 + $477,000 - 0

Operating Cash Flow = $511,000

Therefore Operating Cash Flow is $511,000

3 0

3 years ago

During the phase of the history of U.S. government regulation called industry deregulation, government sought to a. protect comp

Over [174]

Answer:

Option d (increase.....................transportation) seems to be the right option.

Explanation:

This same fourth phase throughout the past decades of U.S. regulatory requirements started throughout the late 1970s as well as focuses primarily on industrial protectionism.
Throughout that stage of development, the current regime has focused on increasing competitive advantage throughout sectors such as construction, utility services, transshipment as well as wealth management by deactivating an amount of regulation but rather allowing companies to diversify their business processes to developing companies.

The interpretation of that same question has been characterized throughout the explanation paragraph below.

4 0

3 years ago

Olivia is a florist who specializes in roses.

Eva8 [605]

Answer:

Olivier does have sufficient contract rights because she already signed a 5 year contract to supply as many roses as possible to Juan. Juan cannot come at the end of two years and break the contract

Explanation:

1. 1. What contract rights and remedies, if any, does Olivia have against Juan?

The most important point of focus from the aspect of the law and statute of frauds is that from the scenario it was stated clearly that ''She has a <u>five-year written contract with Juan to sell him as many roses as he needs for his wedding chapel.</u> ''

Olivier does have sufficient contract rights because she already signed a 5 year contract to supply as many roses as possible to Juan. Juan cannot come at the end of two years and break the contract

2. What contract rights and remedies, if any, does Olivia have against Ann?

The scenario states clearly that ''Ann emailed Olivia an order for <u>"1,000 white stems''</u> and ''Olivia instead sent orchids, the only "white stems" available at the time.''

Hence Olivia fulfilled Ann's orders and Ann has absolutely no case at all. Olivia has acted in accordance to Ann's request and has full rights to claim her payment.

3. What defenses, if any, do Juan and Ann have?

In summary the defenses of both parties are weak

1. Juan has a defense of unforeseen financial difficulties but this will be insufficient to override a written contract

2. Ann assumed that Olivia would send roses but assumption does not work in the eyes of the law but written agreements.

Additionally, Ann could argue that Olivia should have communicated the price of the orchids at the point of processing Ann's orders.

6 0

3 years ago